Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: "Tim Meddick" <timmeddick@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:30:39 +0100
The previous post was not sent by me.
I have never 'attacked' you. I don't know you. But I will respond to any
underhand behaviour displayed in response to legitimate posts by myself or
anyone I have any respect for. I repeat - how do you defend using other
peoples names? Ha, got you, you can't possible have a legitimate answer to
that because there isn't one. It's just something that you don't do, not
least because it's deceptive and gets people's backs up.
==
Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
"Tim Meddick" <trt@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:scBSl.17658$%54.11146@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's what happens to idiots who attack me on a regular basis like you've
been doing. You now need to change your name or it will be ruined like
Leythos's is. I was here first the name is mine.
--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not
waste your time.
David H Lipman, Malke, PA Bear, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, Leythos.
"Tim Meddick" <timmeddick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:emqL5FW3JHA.140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The previous post was not sent by me.
Very, very, very, very funny indeed. Actually, I feel sort of flattered
that you think me worthy of impersonating!
But really, have you got nothing in your life more worthy of your
attention than being here doing this? At best, I think it's sad -
very, very sad.
==
Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
"Tim Meddick" <trt@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_BhSl.22990$as4.6582@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
But you think it is ok to stalk me?
--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not
waste your time.
David H Lipman, Malke, PA Bear, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, Leythos.
"Tim Meddick" <timmeddick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23afBhjI3JHA.1716@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is not the place of volunteers, who are professing to advise on PC
issues, to criticize, impugn, or otherwise make personal comments about
those who ask us for our help or their problems.
==
Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eMKXvUA3JHA.3988@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Randem wrote:
That's ok. It seems that Windows starts all the programs in the [Run]
Section at the same time so the order that they load depends on which
started first and how long it takes to run as well as how much CPU
time is
taken by the other programs so it is really a crap shoot.
It seems that this software that we are using needs to be the last
thing
loaded or it will start shutting down other things such as
permissions
etc...
That sounds like a pretty pathetic software design, IF that is indeed
the case (which sounds dubious).
Now if the other apps are running when this app start to shut things
down it can affect the other apps. That is why I need to get it
started
last.
<...clipped...>
"Randem" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eXOhdp82JHA.5276@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I need to control the order of in which the run entries are
run. There
is some software that absolutely needs to be run last after all
other
entries. How is the [run] section ordered in running? Is it
just a
whatever approach or is there an order to this method?
--
Randem Systems
Your Installation Specialist
The Top Inno Setup Script Generator
http://www.randem.com/innoscript.html
Disk Read Error Press Ctl+Alt+Del to Restart
http://www.randem.com/discus/messages/9402/9406.html?1236319938
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Randem
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Randem
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Randem
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Randem
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Bill in Co.
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- From: Tim Meddick
- Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- Prev by Date: Re: Connecting speakers to PCbutts impersonation again.
- Next by Date: Re: Connecting speakers to PC
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- Next by thread: Re: Is there anyway to control the order of in which the [Run] entries are performed in the registry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|