Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: "Randem" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:35:49 -1000
Really, How would people find out that it was broken? The regular users
generally did not have HD's that were larger than 120GB So they could not
report it for it never affected them until after they got HD bigger than
137GB
--
Randem Systems
Your Installation Specialist
The Top Inno Setup Script Generator
http://www.randem.com/innoscript.html
Disk Read Error Press Ctl+Alt+Del to Restart
http://www.randem.com/discus/messages/9402/9406.html?1236319938
"John John (MVP)" <audetweld@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eg2zuy9uJHA.4648@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What the heck are you mumbling about now? SP1 included the 48-bit LBA fix
(as released the Windows XP ATAPI driver had no 48-bit LBA support and was
incapable of handling large LBA disks). It was very quickly discovered
that the 48-bit LBA fix supplied in SP1 caused problems when the machine
was put into hibernation or when the machine crashed and wrote a memory
dump file. So about 4 months after the release of SP1 a fix was released
to fix the SP1 48-bit LBA ATAPI driver so that it could handle memory
dumps and hibernation.
I don't see the what the release date of SP1 has to do with anything, it
is a well known fact that the initial SP1 48-bit LBA driver had a bug that
was later repaired. What is it that you don't understand? SP1 broke
what? The non existent 48-bit LBA support in the original Windows XP
release? Anyway, I'm done with this thread, you need to update your
knowledge and keep up with the developments in the field, you are at least
6 years behind with this 28-bit 137GB LBA information, an eternity in the
IT world!
Good luck with your endeavours!
John
Randem wrote:
So you are saying that SP1 broke XP? SInce XP was released in October of
2001, from October 2001 to January 22, 2003 is quite a long time....
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Bill in Co.
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- References:
- Disk partitioning size
- From: tempest
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Malke
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Mike Torello
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Disk partitioning size
- Prev by Date: Re: Unallocated partition after removing Acronis secure zone
- Next by Date: Re: repair xp home
- Previous by thread: Re: Disk partitioning size
- Next by thread: Re: Disk partitioning size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|