Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: "Bill in Co." <not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:41:08 -0600
I'll wait up for this too. But, don't hold your breath. :-)
JS wrote:
OK, tell me what to test.
I can setup my test PC for XP or Vista
Give me the steps to perform
(in ordered sequence).
and I'll run the test.
I have a spare 160GB drive, will that do?
--
JS
http:/www.pagestart.com
"Randem" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OkfdZ$uuJHA.4364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Whatever, you LACK of testing abilities shines very brightly here. All
you
can do is attempt to verbally tear down others withh no evidence
what-so-ever. It's a simple test why can't you perform it? Or is that
very
evident?
--
Randem Systems
Your Installation Specialist
The Top Inno Setup Script Generator
http://www.randem.com/innoscript.html
Disk Read Error Press Ctl+Alt+Del to Restart
http://www.randem.com/discus/messages/9402/9406.html?1236319938
"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23vLHm8uuJHA.2596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm sure your "tests" are equally as substantive and valid as Twayne's
(alleged) "tests" on registry cleaners ("speeding up the system"). I'll
leave it at that. LOL.
Randem wrote:
All it take is a simple test... but some how you guys can't seem to do
that... hmmmm.
--
Randem Systems
Your Installation Specialist
The Top Inno Setup Script Generator
http://www.randem.com/innoscript.html
Disk Read Error Press Ctl+Alt+Del to Restart
http://www.randem.com/discus/messages/9402/9406.html?1236319938
"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23VMkJeluJHA.3816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, I think so!
John John (MVP) wrote:
There are tons of Windows XP OEM installation that were shipped out
on
large drives and none of them are failing because of problems with
48-bit LBA addressing! I don't care what you say the facts and
experience of others simply do not support your claims. Computer
manufacturers have been shipping XP installations on 160GB and 250GB
hard drives for many years now and users have been installing retail
versions on large drives for as many years and your assertions simply
do
not bear out. If what you say were true there would have been
*millions* of complaints about this and the problem would be front
page
news and discussed all over the place. I have seen many, many
Windows
XP installations on large hard drives filed to near capacity and none
have succumbed to the 137GB 28-bit LBA barrier, this problem was
addressed with SP1 and your information is out of date
John
Randem wrote:
It has been tested in SP2 and SP3 with ALL updates applied so there
is
certainly no mistake... It is very easy to replicate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- References:
- Disk partitioning size
- From: tempest
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Malke
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Mike Torello
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Bill in Co.
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Bill in Co.
- Re: Disk partitioning size
- From: Randem
- Disk partitioning size
- Prev by Date: transfer files and settings
- Next by Date: Re: Disk partitioning size
- Previous by thread: Re: Disk partitioning size
- Next by thread: Re: Disk partitioning size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading