Re: Confusion over RAM utilization
- From: Andy_XP_Devotee <AndyXPDevotee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:59:00 -0700
Re: Postings from SC Tom and JS, . . .
Tom, I've got a separate video card. My brother, who configured this
machine, has an absolute horror of video cards built into the motherboard.
So I think I'm OK there.
JS, . . . I actually am kind of familiar with how Undo can gum things up.
And it makes sense, too, considering the magic that Undo can effect. I will
do as you suggest (exactly) and watch to see what happens with PhotoShop.
But let me ask you this: If I find that PS is itself the source of my
problem--i.e., PS just wants more than my computer can easily provide without
slowing down--what can I do about it? Specifically, when configuring my next
machine, what should I do with the extra bucks?
I know that I can check the PS site for info on this kind of thing, but I'm
sure that I will meet the "system requirements" listings like what you always
see. (I don't even look at those anymore, to be frank, because the numbers
listed are always so low that any decent machine will exceed them.)
Thanks,
Andy
.
- References:
- Confusion over RAM utilization
- From: Andy_XP_Devotee
- Re: Confusion over RAM utilization
- From: SC Tom
- Confusion over RAM utilization
- Prev by Date: Windows XP Pro SETUP (Setup cannot copy file-s)
- Next by Date: Re: Confusion over RAM utilization
- Previous by thread: Re: Confusion over RAM utilization
- Next by thread: Re: Confusion over RAM utilization
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|