Re: Path too deep error



Thanks to all for their input. I guessed it had something to do with the
limitations of FAT32 vs NTFS. My bigger problem, however, is that most of
the data that needs to be copied to the Storage Server is on LaCie terabyte
drives connected to a bloody Mac, and those drives are formatted in some sort
of proprietary Apple file system.

"Twayne" wrote:

HeyBub wrote:
Richard Southwood wrote:
I'm getting the "path too deep" error message when attempting to copy
a large folder (+200GB) from a USB drive attached to a Windows XP SP3
workstation to a Storage Server 2003 R2 server. Seems that part way
into the copy job the operation will error out on a file. For
example, it recently errored on a file to which the full path to the
file on the server would be:

\\nyc-nas1\AdAge Group\Creativity\test
1\AAO-2006-035\Source\MPEG\carphonewarehouse-accident06.mov_NTSC_6500.m2v

I understand that there is a character limitation, but to my
understanding this entire path does not exceed that limitation.
Also, if I copy the file individually it will copy to the destination
just fine.

The USB drive is formatted as FAT32; the server volume is formatted
as NTFS.

Any suggestions will be most appreciated.

Thanks.

Doesn't look like too long a path; IIRC the max is 160 characters,
counting spaces and all punctuation.
I think I'd try making that last very long filename much shorter
(text.m2v or such) and see if that helps get past it. ARe there many
files with names that long? The "-" could concievably be a problem,
too. I've seen path too deep erros on excessively long filenames
before. Last time I copied them all to a DVD to get the automatically
renamed to shorter names and worked with those after copying them back
to the hard drive.

Just noticed: If you're using FAT or FAT-32, it's almost surely a
problem with the name using bad characters. You might try either using
the short-name for it (//nyc-na~1 unless there is a similarly named
file, in which case it might be ~2, ~3, etc..) , but I think the "-"
screws it up.

You might see if you can do something with it from a Command Prompt
too and use copy or xcopy to copy/move it.
Oh, and rename out those "-"s too; FAT/-32 doesn't care for those IIRC
again. Underscores are always safe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_file_names

Forbidden FAT characters (same as DOS):

a.. ! # $ % & ' ( ) - @ ^ _ ` { } ~
a.. (FAT-32 only) + , . ; = [ ]
a.. Values 128–255

HTH,

Twayne






Reformat the target drive to NTFS. There are just too many
limitations with FAT32 (max file size 4GB, max files in a single
folder 65k, etc.). Yeah, I know: "But I don't have that many files
and they're not that large and that's not what the error message
indicates, and yadda-yadda-yadda..."
But you're hitting SOME kind of limit which will most likely not
exist with NTFS.




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Path too deep error
    ... limitations of FAT32 vs NTFS. ... My bigger problem, however, is that most of the data that needs to be copied to the Storage Server is on LaCie terabyte drives connected to a bloody Mac, and those drives are formatted in some sort of proprietary Apple file system. ... The USB drive is formatted as FAT32; ... limitations with FAT32 (max file size 4GB, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Path too deep error
    ... the limitations of FAT32 vs NTFS. ... drives are formatted in some sort of proprietary Apple file system. ... Windows XP SP3 workstation to a Storage Server 2003 R2 server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: File Searching, how to speed it up?
    ... If you have more data than FAT32 can hold, use ntfs with a larger cluster size. ... If the average disk queue length goes over 2 it does terrible things ... On the other hand, if you have server ... drives you might get a doubling ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance)
  • Re: NTFS support
    ... It was a dual 1gHz system running Win Server 2003. ... which I can move the drives and adapter but it'll be 'way too slow ... If I load Linux on a separate non-RAID drive like I ... Giggling for "linux NTFS" gives me a lot of hits and the impression ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: NTFS support
    ... It was a dual 1gHz system running Win Server 2003. ... which I can move the drives and adapter but it'll be 'way too slow ... Giggling for "linux NTFS" gives me a lot of hits and the impression ... BUT if the data is simply file serving, I reckon samba/linux outperforms Windows server by several times. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)