Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:12:37 -0500
From: "Twayne" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| I can't imagine where you're getting that from;
| data is data and that's it. Long ago there were
| problems with eof markers, etc., but those are no
| longer problems these days and definitely not on
| XP.
| Somehow I suspect you are referring to some
| nuance that no longer exists and is a non-issue as
| the reasons why the files are compressed only on
| the hardware and decompressed as it leaves it. I
| can use WinZip to create the exact same legacy zip
| that XP creates, amongst many others, and they
| will copy just fine, even with the TLD modified to
| try to fool the system into thinking it compressed
| the file. Admittedly a poor/simple bit of foolery,
| but still indicative.
| Unless you can make yourself a lot clearer on
| this, I think there is nothing more I have to say
| to you; you're simply reiterating and not adding
| to the information in any way to support what
| you're saying, so ... nothing left to discuss.
| Twayne
Think for a minute...
LZH, ZIP, ARC, etc, are algorithmic protocols independent of partition schemes.
Compression on NT requires NTFS and is OS dependent. It is different and JJ is correct.
BTW: *All* of our (my "company") data on our AD based server is using compression and
frankly, I don't see any degradation in reading/writing data over the wire. It certainly
has stretched that .25TB volume for us.
--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
.
- References:
- NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: ME
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Mike Hall - MVP
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: ME
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Ken Blake, MVP
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: ME
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Ken Blake, MVP
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Mike Hall - MVP
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Twayne
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- From: Twayne
- NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Time unstable at synchronising?
- Next by Date: Re: I can't access the Windows update site
- Previous by thread: Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- Next by thread: Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 - Fight!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|