Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- From: "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I.can@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:03:43 +0100
"Bob I" <birelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eH1Uda3bJHA.1528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pegasus (MVP) wrote:
"Bob I" <birelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23xvaN7EZJHA.1328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Using the correct file type IS fixing the issue. What you are wanting is
is to avoid fixing the issue. You may be have the problem as a side
effect of a security update. What you are seeing is an opening and
closing of the file for each command. Simply correcting the extension
will cause desired behaviour.
I trust you've read the conclusion to this issue. Both .cmd and .bat are
"correct" extensions for a batch file and they are treated almost
identically by Windows. For all practical purposes you can use either
under Windows XP.
Yes, I did. I personally stick with CMD for NT operating systems, while I
use BAT on the 98 boxes.
This is probably a good idea because it automatically tags the files as
written for NT vs. Win9x style OSs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- From: Pegasus \(MVP\)
- Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- From: Bob I
- Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- Prev by Date: Re: CCleaner and the Registry
- Next by Date: Re: Folder "shared documents" on C:\, folder to be shared on D:\
- Previous by thread: Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- Next by thread: Re: Issue in execution of batch files Windows XP Pro
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading