Re: XP (x86) or (x64)

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry



Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:02:47 -0600, "Bill in Co."
<not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:56:13 +0100, "M.I.5¾"
<no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7o5294pkro0kbun757ct26s2g1n93u8vf3@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:08:43 -0700 (PDT), Mike <SulfateIon@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Hi

I'd like to know what Windows XP (x86) and Windows XP (x64) are?
I use Windows XP, but I don't know which one I use.
How do I know?



x86 is 32-bit Windows, and x64 is 64-bit Windows.

The answer, for almost everyone who has to ask, is that you using
32-bit (x86).


For the curious: x86 is a reference to the x86 series of processors
which
started with the intel 8086 processor (which was a 16 bit processor and
wouldn't be able to run a 32 bit operating system).


And interestingly was never used in a PC. The first PC used an 8088
instead.

Pretty similar, though. :-)
It's been awhile, though, and I can't remember the difference between the
8088 and 8086 anymore.


The major difference is that the 8088 was 8-bit and the 8086 16-bit.


I seem to remember 20-bit *addressing*, and a 16
bit word size for the *data* bus.

That's what I said too. But there was a notable difference between the
two, and maybe the 8088 only had a 8 bit *data* bus.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: KB928089 (for IE7 users)
    ... Cause the Update History on the Windows/Microsoft Update site lists ... the "Windows Internet Explorer 7" section. ... Win XP Professional x64 based ... Looked in My Computer but it doesn't tell me whether it's x86 ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • Re: Intel Based Macs...?
    ... >> expressed publicly) before Windows is updated to take advantage of them. ... > Note that while you deny here that Apple would shut out Microsoft ... It may be that the likelihood that x86 Macs aren't commodity PCs is ... >> the only thing that keeps the Mac version of Office alive. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.misc)
  • Re: opengl
    ... Except, I thought I heard a few years back, that Apple and MicroSquash were semi partners in some mannor or another? ... Almost all CAD programs are OpenGL and doing something like this essentially guarantees Vista/Longhorn is a non-starter with them. ... will essentially run on any x86 machine but Apple is putting a hardware key into their x86 Macs so x86 OSX will only install and run on them. ... several developers have installed VMware on their x86 Macs and found Windows 2000 and WindowsXP will install and multiple boot on them just fine with almost no speed penalty. ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.lightwave)
  • Re: Saw 10.4.1 Running On a PC Laptop Today
    ... >>> Phil Shiller said Macs would run Windows or words to that effect. ... Will Intel OS X run on any x86 ... > Apple x86 hw will be just as fast as Dell, ... But you don't need to replace hardware. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: It is almost certain now, INTEL will have 64bit x86 !!
    ... but not Windows 2000 on IBM/Unisys etc ... >with low end x86 systems. ... >additional transition costs was too great for HP as a single company ... you cluster, and clustered solutions are not the solution too often. ...
    (comp.os.vms)