Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- From: "Timothy Daniels" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:42:25 -0700
"tcarp" wrote:
[......]
Deciding on whether to get cloning capabilities (in the tools
I ultimately select) is probably going to boil down to the
convenience of having a clone and the software cost (if it's
separate from imaging capabilities).
Let me ask a question about what to clone. I assume it's
obvious that for computers with relatively small internal HDs
(the machine I'm using right now is 30G) a full clone of the
entire HD is both impractical and (in my case) physically
impossible.
I have other computers on my home net (a Mac Mini, and
a couple other PCs) but all have internal HDs <40G or so.
I do have a couple externals (160G each).
So, if I have cloning as part of my backup strategy can/should
I put it on an external? If yes, it can be a little bit of an issue
with my laptops (we tend to go places together without the
external HDs).
Laptops present a problem for cloning because the average
laptop doesn't have a 2nd hard drive, and unless the laptop's
motherboard IO controller has an eSATA port like some desktop
PCs do, booting the clone from storage media is almost impossible.
I've tried using an eSATA ExpressCard adapter, but the external
hard drive isn't seen by the system until the OS is loaded - making
it impossible to use for booting the OS. My Dell laptop claims to
be bootable from "USB devices", and Dell Tech Support steadfastly
adhers to that claim, but they haven't told me how to boot a USB
hard drive, yet. The only "USB device" that I've been able to boot
from is a USB "thumb drive". So for a laptop, a failed hard drive
means physically replacing the internal hard drive with another
internal hard drive that contains the clone. If the failure is file
corruption due to a failing write head, it's likely to corrupt all the
partitions on the internal hard drive as well, so keeping a clone on
another partition doesn't make much sense. Even keeping a clone
on another internal hard drive doesn't make sense if virus recovery
is the purpose, as viruses can migrate to all partitions that the OS
can "see". One way around this is to disable the backup hard drive
during normal operation via the BIOS. Another way, that I use, is
to switch off the power connection to the backup hard drive with a
small toggle switch that is mounted in a chassis vent hole just under
the plastic fascia. As long as the backup hard drive is unpowered,
the BIOS and the OS can't "see" it. There are also 3rd-party software
utilities which can render a partition "hidden" - BootItNG being one
of them. But for laptops, unless you have a 2nd internal hard drive,
you're pretty much out of luck for a quick backup. In such a case,
the quickest recovery (assuming the internal hard drive hasn't failed)
is to have a clone or an image file on an external hard drive (eSATA,
USB or Firewire - eSATA being fastest), and copy it back to the
internal hard drive.
Up until Casper 4.0 came out, there was another problem with
putting a clone on the same hard drive as the original OS. That had
to do with the initial startup OF THE CLONE after it had been made.
Although the parent OS could view the clone without a problem,
the clone had to be kept from seeing its parent OS when the clone
started up for the first time. Otherwise, the clone got its own files
confused with those of its parent, and sometimes the confusion was
so subtle as not to be noticed until much later when the parent OS
was removed. Now, with Casper 4.0, the utility is smart enough to
prepare the clone for the First Startup situation, and putting the clone
on the same hard drive *may* not present a problem. Otherwise,
you'd have to "hide" the parent OS's partition before starting up the
clone for its first run.
All these problems make cloning less suitable for laptops. The
only advantage is that copying a clone back to an internal hard drive
may use slightly less time because no expansion is needed in copying
a compressed image file.
*TimDaniels*
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- From: PA20Pilot
- Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- From: Timothy Daniels
- Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- From: tcarp
- Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- Prev by Date: Re: Winodws XP
- Next by Date: Re: Winodws XP
- Previous by thread: Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- Next by thread: Re: Clone vs. image (I promise not the same ol ground)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|