Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: PD43 <pauld1943@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:45:41 -0500
"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK (and I probably should have known this).
But above, I thought you had said that "the file system (in XP) does not
need to flip through each individual cluster to find the next one", and I
mistakenly thought you were implying that FAT was that way (in contrast with
NT). But maybe you're talking about going through the entries within the
table itself (FAT or MFT).
I think you'd be crippled if your parentheses keys ever stopped
working. It'd be like tying an Italian's hands behind his back and
then telling him to talk.
.
- References:
- Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: JCO
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: Leythos
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: JCO
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: Leythos
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: Bill in Co.
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: John John (MVP)
- Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- From: Bill in Co.
- Speed Disk vs Defrag
- Prev by Date: Re: determining #ram slots and # of slots currently in use
- Next by Date: Re: forgot password
- Previous by thread: Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- Next by thread: Re: Speed Disk vs Defrag
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|