Re: Thinking about buying Norton's AntiVirus

Clue I have about you is that you use or have used and push Symantec
products. That's all I need.
"Brian A." <gonefish'n@afarawaylake> wrote in message
news:eZOM3DjpIHA.2256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wrong again on the second count, I never mentioned Symantec products were
great. I mentioned I've used them form back when and never had any
concerning issues to me. Strike Two.

Not only are you off the board on you third statement, you obviously have
no clue what-so-ever about me. Strike Three, Buh Bye.

--


Brian A. Sesko { MS MVP_Windows Desktop User Experience }
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375


"Unknown" <unknown@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vM2Qj.2050$LQ4.1779@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thousands of posts have been sent concerning problems with Norton and
Symantic programs. Yet you claim they're great.
If that isn't being brainwashed then you must be a Norton salesman. I.E.
FOS.
"Brian A." <gonefish'n@afarawaylake> wrote in message
news:OwMJI9hpIHA.4760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Far from!

--


Brian A. Sesko { MS MVP_Windows Desktop User Experience }
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375


"Unknown" <unknown@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DK0Qj.273$506.156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wow. Are you brainwashed.
"Brian A." <gonefish'n@afarawaylake> wrote in message
news:uMUTxPZpIHA.1580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"HeyBub" <heybub@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e5AGWFZpIHA.3804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brad wrote:
Hi,

Note: I have used NAV (Norton's AntiVirus) 2001 on a Windows 98se
computer(s) in the past.

Over a month ago, I bought a new Dell laptop with Windows XP home
edition. It came with Trend Micro PC-cillin (30 days trial)
pre-installed. I am thinking about buying NAV, assuming it allows
me to control (preferences) how it "behaves" as NAV 2001 did. I
don't want NAV always running in the background. I want to be able
to "run" NAV to check folders, etc. when I want, the same way I did
using NAV 2001.

What is your experience with the new version of NAV?

I doubt anyone on this group would recommend Norton, or, to a lesser
degree McCaffee.

There are several problems with Norton:

1. It is a resource hog, burning up to 15% of available CPU cycles.

Huh? As I currently look, not a single Symantec I have installed is
using any at all.

2. It is difficult to remove. Very difficult. You have to run the
secret Symantec removal tool several times then manually scan the
registry for detritus left behind.

There's nothing secret about their removal utility, it's been around
for years, no different than any of the other applications and
Symantec isn't the only one that has registry entries that are not
removed.

3. Norton interferes with many software installations - and doesn't
tell you it's bothering the install process. You end up with an
application that won't work and you don't know why. Virtually every
bit of software that tells you to "disable your virus checker" before
continuing really means "Disable Norton."

If you truly believe your last statement, you truly don't realize the
importance of shutting down running programs when installing an
application.


--


Brian A. Sesko { MS MVP_Windows Desktop User Experience }
Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://basconotw.mvps.org/

Suggested posting do's/don'ts: http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375










.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thinking about buying Nortons AntiVirus
    ... Have been using Norton since Peter Norton wrote the product many, ... NAV has had problems, I don't deny that in its long history. ... not a single Symantec I have installed is ... tell you it's bothering the install process. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Thinking about buying Nortons AntiVirus
    ... Symantic programs. ... If that isn't being brainwashed then you must be a Norton salesman. ... I have used NAV 2001 on a Windows 98se ... not a single Symantec I have installed is ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: best current anti virus software?
    ... Did you try to Symantec NIS 2005 and 2006? ... BTW, I think its not right to generalize that Symantec is crappy as my ... Shane is pretty right on about the corporate version of NAV and there's ... Symantec Corporate Edition is a much leaner application than the home ...
    (alt.comp.anti-virus)
  • [Full-Disclosure] Re: Norton AntiVirus 2002 fails to scan files with ...
    ... so that one is silently fixed by Symantec. ... > that will crash NAV ... > report before, did you? ... with special ASCII char. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Thinking about buying Nortons AntiVirus
    ... Wrong again on the second count, I never mentioned Symantec products were great. ... Brian A. Sesko ... I have used NAV 2001 on a Windows 98se ... I doubt anyone on this group would recommend Norton, or, to a lesser degree McCaffee. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)