Re: USB 2.0 in XP Pro with SP2

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



"rhino" <No.offline.contact.please@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Okd73WkTIHA.4440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I recently purchased my first flash drive. I am running XP Pro SP2 on my PC
and have several USB ports, some at Version 1.1 and some at Version 2.0.

When I put the flash drive in any of the USB 2.0 ports, nothing happens;
they don't seem to be seeing the flash drive. When I put the flash drive
in a USB 1.1 port, the flash drive is recognized but XP displays a message
telling me that I will get much better results by using a 2.0 port.

What do I need to do to get the 2.0 ports to work correctly?

I did a Google search that took me to a site saying that USB 2.0 doesn't
work correctly in XP with SP2; it pointed me to a knowledgebase article
that recommended downloading a Hotfix for this problem. I've got the
Hotfix "invitation" but haven't actually downloaded the Hotfix yet. I
talked to a colleague who works with XP all the time and he's never heard
of an issue involving USB 2.0 so I'm wondering if this Hotfix is really
the best approach. Would it make more sense to update drivers or
something?

I don't know anything about troubleshooting USB issues so forgive my
ignorance in this matter. In fact, I'm not even sure how to tell which of
my ports are 1.1 and which are 2.0 or how to match those ports to the
various USB items in Device Manager. For what it's worth, my other USB
devices like my mouse and scanner seem to work fine.

For what it's worth, I'm not actually all that worried about the flash
drive performing to its full potential; the 1.1 ports go fast enough for
my purposes. However I am very actively considering adding another hard
drive to this computer so I'd like to get USB 2.0 working so that the hard
drive will not crawl if I get a USB-based hard drive.

By the way, with USB 2.0 capable of 480 mpbs, is that going to be faster
than having an internal hard drive or is it still going to be slower? I
can't recall the actual speeds of a regular internal drive. Perhaps I
should just get an internal drive and avoid having to mess with USB
altogether....

--
Rhino


The bus carrying data back and forth to/from the hard drive must be slower
than the hard drive is capable of delivering/receiving. USB 2.0 and
Firewire 400 speed are not a problem here. The last version of Firewire 800
speed, and the upcoming USB 3.0 are a problem with most current and past
hard drives.
Dave


.



Relevant Pages

  • Drives missing at boot
    ... finds its disk drives at each boot. ... Capabilities: Advanced Error Reporting ... 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801JI USB ... Capabilities: PCI Advanced Features ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Need USB card with enough power for external hard drive
    ... work plugged directly into a USB port on a different laptop. ... into a normal USB port just for the purpose of supplying power to the card. ... Internal hard drives ... USB flash drives are BIG. ...
    (comp.sys.laptops)
  • Re: Need USB card with enough power for external hard drive
    ... work plugged directly into a USB port on a different laptop. ... into a normal USB port just for the purpose of supplying power to the card. ...  Internal hard drives ...  USB flash drives are BIG. ...
    (comp.sys.laptops)
  • Re: Bootable USB HDD
    ... with the ability to boot from USB is required. ... both of whom stated that USB external drives ... >>>>USB external hard drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Apple has a lousy sense of humor...
    ... And why would you need a usb hub and external drive? ... Edwin has unfortunately forgotten that the standard Mac keyboard has ... two USB ports on it, which means that there's actually enough ports ... SATA drives, which as per techreport.com's WorldBench overall ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)