Multi-boot - worth keeping - config ?



Currently 2 disk drives , 1 DVD, 2 CDRW's, AMD Athlon 2ghz ,single CPU, 1gb mem. on my Microsoft box: X64 and Vista rarely used now and thinking of simply Multibooting 2000/XP. What do you think ? Worth doing this to keep my OS options open ? Or just pull the X64/Vista drive and use the 300gb for MY stuff - not OS'es. Not crazy about Maxtor drive as my primary so just bought a Seagate drive and I'm looking at reconfig.

In BIOS I currently have boot order set to IDE then SATA
Drive1 - Western Digital IDE has 5 partitions:
X64, XP ( basic/test install only), Vista32 Beta ,Vista64 Beta, Temp

Drive 2 = Maxtor SATA currently 3 partitions:
2 are XP bootable partititions ( my old and current ) and one is my Archive area. ( MY Stuff)

That way I can just toggle BIOS boot order - or remove the X64 drive - and all works OK. SATA alone boots to XP fine.
For getting W2k to boot - what's the EASIEST way to achieve that ? Overwrite the old XP partition on drive 2 and if pointed to w2k partition at boot time, XP loader would just recognize it and continue ?

Drive 3 = new 300gb Seagate SATA
Looking at reconfig: how would you organize ?
All OS'es on new/old SATA drive ?
I was thinking of:
1. ghosting the IDE to new SATA ( so to not reinstall OS'es)
2. Then replace xp test partition with image of my current / daily XP partition.
3. Maybe ... then replace TEMP partition with Win2000.
Result: Then I have all OS'es on the newest drive
Win 2000, xp,x64,vista32/64 (yeah Beta -I'll delete another time)
and then
4. use a separate disk for just my Archive/Library area. (new drive)

I have only 4 power connections in the 500w supply so would like just 2 disks ( I do have a few Y connectors in there now and rarely use the CD/DVDs)

[ Currently I boot to IDE disk where I choose Vista or X64 or XP
If XP, then my boot menu =
XP on SATA partitition 1 ( reinstalled when I bought the drive
last year)
or
XP on SATA partitition 2 ( an old ghosted/backup install )
or
XP Test on the IDE ]
Why Win 2000 ? I used to know W2000 really well and hated XP - realizing that I've forgotten the differences, I just want to 'not lose it' since some businesses are still running W2k. I currently have Win2000 on it's own drive but don't want to use an IDE port/power for it.

Thanks,
Bobb

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: ARC boot path question SATA vs IDE boot order
    ... rdisk = 1 for SATA = XP Pro. ... I can now install Vista x64 to the IDE drive ... [boot loader] ... The only thing it lacks is partition selection to find the OS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: ARC boot path question SATA vs IDE boot order
    ... you got the IDE and SATA HD boot ... The only thing it lacks is partition selection to find the OS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: ARC boot path question SATA vs IDE boot order
    ... selected at boot time. ... "Windows XP Pro on SATA drive C" ... Master, IDE ch. ... The only thing it lacks is partition selection to find the OS. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: ARC boot path question SATA vs IDE boot order
    ... So - with SATA as first boot - my boot.ini would be: ... Master, IDE ch. ... The only thing it lacks is partition selection to find the OS. ... Now, as you have found, when the SATA HD boot order is ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Cant access anymore
    ... Alternatively can i boot of my IDE which uses the same ... username and admin password and access the files. ... with the SATA still connected. ... Boots fine on the old IDE ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)

Loading