Re: Increased RAM but see no or little speed difference

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



On Apr 27, 3:26 pm, Tom Porterfield <tppor...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sandeep Kulkarni wrote:
Hello All,
I am running a WinXP SP2 on 1.9GHz CPU. When Windows was installed,
there was 256MB RAM available. Recently I added 512MB RAM to the
computer. So now there is total 768 MB running at 266MHz FSB. That is
the max FSB my motherboard (845 GVAD2) and CPU combination can
support.
But then I don't see much difference in performance. So what may be
the reason for this? Do I need to reinstall Windows to take effect of
hardware change or there may be some other solution?
Thank you,
Sandeep

Whether or not you see a speed difference depends on how you use your
PC. If you do not use a lot of memory intensive applications, and you
were not seeing a lot of extra page file usage with 256 MB, then there
is little reason to think that adding more RAM would increase
performance by a significant amount.
--
Tom Porterfield

Tom,
Though I don't use memory intensive applications, but I felt the
performance for that amount of RAM to be lower than expected.
Also according to several posts in newsgroup, it is better to run
WinXP with 512MB of memory. So I added the memory expecting a increase
in performance.
Even while using Windows Explorer for browsing folders/files without
running any other application there was noticeable delay. Only thing
running in background is AVG Antivirus Free 7. Now after adding the
memory still there is delay. As this computer is not connected to
network, so there should have been noticeable difference in browsing.
But I am unable to see that.
I will try to follow suggestions give by earlier posters. And will
post back my comments.
Thank you,
Sandeep

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP And RAM
    ... you can only use *around* 3.1GB of RAM. ... For Windows Vista to use all 4 GB of memory on a computer that has 4 GB ... Chipsets that support AMD processors that use socket F, socket 940, ... These chipsets include any AMD socket and CPU ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics)
  • Re: Windows XP Startup
    ... "Terry R." ... I can't stand it how when I boot Windows XP the desktop appears but I'm not able to use it yet 'cause it's still loading my programs and services. ... Strange how the computer I'm using today doesn't make me any more productive than the ones I used back in 1988 with a memory manager and DeskView (386-20 with 2 meg of RAM). ... Other than install more RAM, faster hard drive, and graphics card (assuming you already have a fast CPU), there isn't much left to do, if you've already removed unnecessary items from the Startup Menu, etc. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Windows XP Startup
    ... "Terry R." ... XP-M 2400+) and the ram is maxed out. ... I can't stand it how when I boot Windows XP the desktop appears but I'm not ... I use Antivir for AV and it doesn't bog the CPU at all. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Paging File on Second HDD
    ... With an older computer adding RAM can be non-productive. ... CPU involves replacing the motherboard and the cost starts to ... and it plays Windows XP like a fiddle. ... and moving the paging file from the C: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: What is the Switch to Show Maximum RAM?
    ... I've thrown more stable PCs in the trash. ... It crashes during Windows security updates...etc. ... Intel Core 2 Quad 9450 CPU ... BTW. I'm not sure where to apply the switch for the RAM. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)