Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: "GO" <aa533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:01:08 -0500
"Homer J. Simpson" <root@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uISEuT5gHHA.4704@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
thatThe Filters block by IP(s) on a schedule, URL, MAC or Domain.
The Firewall will Allow/Deny by Source/Destination, IP Range, Protocol
and Port Range on a schedule.
This pretty much confirms what I was saying. There is only one PC in
Otherhousehold. The filtering needs to be done with respect to the Windows
user.
Nobody, huh?
The folks who are trying to control this are now telling it'd be perfectly
acceptable if this one user has his internet access blocked entirely.
accounts must remain untouched however.it--but
I suppose removing that user's access to Internet Explorer would do
obviously, just deleting any shortcut pointing to iexplore.exe is not
foolproof enough.
If you require no networking capabilities at all (assuming this is just a
stand-along machine) you could release the IP or just disable the NIC. In
both cases your extra users would have to have "user" permissions not
administrator. Other than that I think you'll have to start looking into
third party alternatives.
.
- References:
- Controlling internet access...
- From: Homer J. Simpson
- Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: Brian A.
- Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: Homer J. Simpson
- Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: Brian A.
- Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: Homer J. Simpson
- Re: Controlling internet access...
- From: Homer J. Simpson
- Controlling internet access...
- Prev by Date: Re: Calling Wesley Vogel
- Next by Date: Re: Microsoft to sell Windows/Office package for $3 overseas-With strings
- Previous by thread: Re: Controlling internet access...
- Next by thread: Issue with file Ntdll.dll and wordperfect X13
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|