Re: SATA dives
- From: "Scott Thomas" <scottcthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:09:30 -0500
Yeah, problem is that you wouldn't benefit from SATA if you used an adapter.
PCI busses aren't as fast as SATA.
I've read that PCI is limited to 133Megs/sec, but SATA starts at
150Megs/sec, so it would be futile. You would be better off with PATA in
that case.
"vernon" <there@there> wrote in message
news:OjJ$OGYcHHA.1216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
extended
"vernon" <there@there> wrote in message
news:u6wJuZJcHHA.3408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I know this is not a hardware N.G. but there are a lot of savvy people
here.
Assuming one has a decent computer without a SATA interface or an
pci slot, does anyone know of a SATA upgrade adaptor that works?
The answer I came up with is that a MB only capable of IDE or ATA has no
better performance with SATA. So, why bother.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SATA dives
- From: Bob I
- Re: SATA dives
- References:
- SATA dives
- From: vernon
- Re: SATA dives
- From: vernon
- SATA dives
- Prev by Date: Re: Suggestion for newer OS (technical)
- Next by Date: Re: 2nd hand PC- Licence issue on XP
- Previous by thread: Re: SATA dives
- Next by thread: Re: SATA dives
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|