Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: "Gerry Cornell" <gcjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:07:52 -0000
I was merely passing on what the vendors of System Commander were advising regarding their programme.
I am not sure I would dual boot Windows ME with Windows Vista. Surely if a computer was built for Windows ME you are going to encounter all types of hardware compatibility issues?
--
Hope this helps.
Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Noncompliant wrote:
SC works in 2 phases. The first part resides in the mbr area of
the hard disk. That's where the actual boot partition selection
is made. The second part resides in a bootable primary
partition. That's where the eye candy, GUI, and other optional
stuff exist. I keep this in a Windows Millenium partition. IE,
its not necessary to install in Vista partition. Perhaps not
smart to do so either even if its fixed in a subsequent version
of SC.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Noncompliant
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- References:
- Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: markm75
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Rock
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Gerry Cornell
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Noncompliant
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Gerry Cornell
- Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- From: Noncompliant
- Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- Prev by Date: Re: My Linux Page
- Next by Date: Registry Find & Replace
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- Next by thread: Re: Vista and ME, 98, XP on System Commander 8 problems...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|