Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: "Rock" <rock@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:56:50 -0800
It's not that it may even apply in Vista, it does apply in the x86 versions of Vista.
"AIANDAS" <Aiandas@Odysseia$.com> wrote
Sorry I should have written the fact that my graphics card has its own memory. But I think the "Cooler Dude" sent an article which has been an eye opener. Another poster said this may even apply with Vista, i.e., you have 4 gigs yet Windows will show less due to the allocation config etc
"Jim" <j.n@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
"AIANDAS" <Aiandas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Usually the SONY boxes do this but I have a dellWell, Dell use cards which use shared memory also.
Everybody does. The careful buyers don't buy computers which have such graphics cards.
Jim"Rich Barry" <rbarry@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Just a thought. If you have a onboard graphic chip some of the memory would be diverted there.
"AIANDAS" <Aiandas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
I have I am running XP SP2 on a dell poweredge 400sc. I used to have 3 gigs of memory and have upgrade it so now it's 4 gigs. The PC Wizard shows I have 4 gigs of memory so does the BIOS. However when I right-click the MY COMPUTER icon it is telling I have 3.62 gigs. Anyone can explain this and do I need to apply a "patch" or something? Thanks.
--
Rock [MVP - User/Shell]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: Tim Slattery
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- References:
- MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: AIANDAS
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: Rich Barry
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: AIANDAS
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: Jim
- Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- From: AIANDAS
- MEMORY UPGRADE
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Windows such a piece of Crap
- Next by Date: RE: Sticky keys
- Previous by thread: Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- Next by thread: Re: MEMORY UPGRADE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|