Re: not genuine Windows

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:49:54 +0000, Leythos wrote:

In article <ec0jnr01sh9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nostop@xxxxxxxxxx says...
What you're suggesting just makes no sense - as so much of what you say
around here, is just unbelievable, even if you decide to shout it out in
caps.

Keep trying, you can't prove anything I've written is incorrect, in
fact, you can only keep ranting and trying to divert from the truth, but
it won't work.

The problem with that is that we have three Linux users here
confirming that Linux installs/updates aren't as slow as you claim. Hop on
over to comp.os.linux.misc and ask, and a whole newsgroup full of linux
users will confirm it. I don't know what you're doing wrong, but I suspect
you're updating a whole lot more than the core and one office application.

Just out of curiosity, what was your update command, what did you use as
your MS Office equivalent, is it running under gnome or KDE, and what
other applications were installed?

Maybe instead of claiming you know a bunch of things, you might try
proving that you know a bunch of things by stating facts, so far I've
not seen you provide any technical facts on anything you've suggested.

The only "technical fact" you've provided is a subjective claim that three
experienced Linux users don't find credible.

.

Loading