Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- From: "antioch" <r.antiochdunkthis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:18:10 +0100
"kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ehDr0vumGHA.3880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bobby wrote:I am with you all the way on that one Kurt - perhaps he wants his system to
Only an idiot would ever consider installing it for any other
purpose.
Sorry, was my question: "Do only idiots install beta software for any
reason other than testing?"?
You stated:
"I am considering installing Vista Beta 2."
I replied to that with:
Beta software is meant for testing purposes only. Only an idiot would
ever consider installing it for any other purpose.
Your questions are meaningless after that.
--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
crash at regular intervals whilst MS gets another tester for free. But then
he will keep posting here to get the probs solved ;-)
More amateur testers the better I say, then with any luck when it finally
gets on the market, those who have waited patiently might, I repeat might,
pay a lot of money for a slightly more stable OS.
Antioch
.
- References:
- Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- From: Bobby
- Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- From: Bobby
- Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- From: kurttrail
- Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- Prev by Date: Re: xp changes drive letter on it's own
- Next by Date: Re: Shutting off
- Previous by thread: Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- Next by thread: Re: Considering Vista Beta 2 (public version)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|