Re: Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- From: "kroger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kroger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Jun 2006 18:34:34 -0700
Yes, because the Help in Windows XP specifically says so, and becasue
I understand that XP can access the two independently, and thus often,
in parallel.
Now I am asking about addressing space under XP.
Thanks,
Jim
DL wrote:
Haveing posted a similar Q a few days ago, and following the replies, is
there some specific reason why you still think 4gb of page file split across
two drives is going to help?
Just wondered
<kroger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150840882.645637.268710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi, I have one gig of hard RAM and set my page file to 4 gigs, in two
2-gig partitions, one on each of two hard drives.
I know windows XP (32 bit version) can only address 4 gigs of hard RAM.
Is that also true for memory in general such that the total of hard RAM
+ page file that the system can see is 4 gigs total? So it can only see
three gigs of my four gigs of page file?
Thanks much!
Jim
.
- References:
- Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- From: kroger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- From: DL
- Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- Next by Date: Re: Admin Name change not recognized thruout
- Previous by thread: Re: Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- Next by thread: Re: Total addressable by XP....RAM+Page file=4 gigs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|