Re: cross post: mount partition as folder?

This is a multi post, not a cross post

"Callmark1" <Callmark1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1C59FC91-8696-4E3D-BCFA-44B17FAC2E19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you all for your dedication to this site. I have learned so much in
the few weeks I have been reading. I started reading because I have been
planning a clean re-install-- the basics of which I am fairly familiar
with
since having installed/upgraded XP for several friends. My target date is
this weekend. So I will likely be posting several times until then. My
question of the moment is in regards to Larry Gardner's recent reply about
partitions:

<snip>

My system is setup this way:

1. C: - Windows XP OS
2. D: - Documents ans Settings for all profiles
3. E: - Third-Party/Additionally installed Software (software not part
of
basic Windows out-of-the-box XP OS)
4. F: - Backup

<snip>

My current setup is similar (except for a copy of Win98SE on C, thus XP
enumeration starts at letter D) but I have apparently set it up in a
rather
cumbersome fashion. I sometimes find myself fiddling with partitions
instead
of working.

My question is this: would it be better to mount partitions to folders,
i.e.- E: as the Program Files folder and F: as the Docs & Settings folder,
rather than "forcing" 3rd party software to install onto a folder on the
E:
partition? If so, should one mount before or after installing the bulk of
applications (does it even matter?).

Also, as regards to taking system images, if one has mounted partitions as
folders, I assume that Norton Ghost would include the contents of a
mounted
partition as part of the backup since it should read the partition just as
if
it WAS the folder. Is this asuumption correct? Further, in the event of
restoring said image, would Ghost automatically "re-mount" the partition
to
its original configuration? or would it try to stuff it all onto the same
partition as the OS?

System:
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition, v2002, SP2
Intel Celeron CPU 2.40GHz
2.39 GHz, 512 RAM
40GB hard drive (more than I need)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: System Volume Information Wont Die
    ... Bert knows way more about System Restore and System Volume Information then ... You cannot delete any of the System Volume Information folders or the ... my life with fewer partitions. ... I never understood why I had SVI folders in my former Pictures, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: after merged partitions, access denied to data folders
    ... Yes I am giving Symantec h**l. ... data inside the two "inaccesible" folders upon opening (or worse, ... I have reliable backups of the clean install from C:. ... partitions D, E & F into D. During each of the two processes, PM advised ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: OT: improving Vista tips?
    ... If the primary dies then any logical partitions will be accessible. ... dividing your programs and data which is a very good idea. ... For me it's more about portability (can move paritions to their own drives if they become too big) and ability to run existing tools which rely on having disks to work with. ... So for example I now back up partitions instead of folders, and delete my whole T:/ partition instead of multiple folders. ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)
  • Re: Sharing folders problem.
    ... troubleshooting is not accessible errorTroubleshooting "... ... Have enabled sharing on these partitions. ... I thought if i enabled sharing on the partition it enabled sharing for all the folders on that partition. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Password protect hard drives...
    ... partitions) using XP's built-in NTFS security facilities. ... Under NTFS you can set permissions on individual folders and ... -*- Different passwords for different drives. ...
    (uk.comp.misc)