Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- From: "Alan" <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:32:14 -0400
I guess I'll just leave mine alone for now. Thanks for testing. :>
Alan
"R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eUTci8yjGHA.984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just as a test case, I renamed the 2 files on my system to a
non-functional extension .org. They are not part of the WFP
(Windows File Protection) as no immediate replacements
were applied. I rebooted and only the .Dat in:
C:\Docs & Settings\'MyProfileName'\Local Settings\Application
Data
was recreated. The other .dat retained it's .Org extension.
Apparently, Windows itself recreates the single .Dat and the
others may not be required/needed by the system.
"Alan" <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:128ua85bp5ofra2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Questioner,
Well, I have 9 copies of it on my PC, and nothing seems amiss right now.
Also, I got no warnings from Windows Defender, Spybot Search and Destroy,
Pest Patrol, and Ad-Aware when I ran all these today after reading about
this file.
So....I'm not going to get too scared.....YET!! :>
Alan
"Questioner" <Questioner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B891AC9F-66B0-4437-9A97-AC4B6CBD6834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So is it bad or not? Is it adware or should I just leave it? (things are
complicated when parasites use legit names!)
.
- References:
- Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- From: Alan
- Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- From: R. McCarty
- Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- From: Alan
- Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- From: R. McCarty
- Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- Prev by Date: Re: Speed comparison; WinXP and WinME
- Next by Date: Re: Block ftp://ftp.task.gda.pl/ in explorer - How to?
- Previous by thread: Re: GDIPFONTCACHEV1
- Next by thread: Re: windows wont start after disk copy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|