Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: "Kerry Brown" <kerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*a*m>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 07:07:13 -0700
If Spinrite can't repair the disk it is no good. Get what you can off it and
trash it.
--
Kerry
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
Hugo Trebl wrote:
Hi all
got some bad sectors on a hard drive recently.
Most things are backed up, but, as usual, not everything in the most
recent version.
I attempted to relocate the data in the damaged sectors with Spinrite,
which reported some partial success.
I also cloned the disc in case further sectors go bad. (I no longer
use it for work)
Now the NTFS file system is naturally still damaged. What steps should
I take to fix it?
Is chkdsk /r my best choice or is there a better tool?
My main concern is finding out which files are most likely corrupted,
and my second concern to recover what is salvageable.
I want to know which files are likely to be damaged so I know which
ones to restore from previous versions, and which ones to keep.
chkdsk (whitout /r) finds several errors, but reports mainly file
numbers and file segment numbers, so is not very helpful with
assessing the damage. I don't know how good it is with repairing.
Any other options?
I am sorry, I posted this three days ago in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain but noone seemd to know an
answer, so I am retrying here.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: Hugo Trebl
- Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- References:
- repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- From: Hugo Trebl
- repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Prev by Date: Re: msconfig
- Next by Date: Re: Dual Removable Drives as a Backup Solution(?)
- Previous by thread: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Next by thread: Re: repair NTFS: better than chkdsk?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|