Re: Running out of memory or system resources for no apparent reason

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

Yes there are limits, they are just a lot higher than the Win9x versions had. Memory isn't the only constraint, tables for tracking the open programs threads,pointers ,etc also have limits.

johndog wrote:

It was a shot, but it didn't help.

I just reproduced the problem on my 1.5GB server. Plenty of capacity, plenty of drive space.

This time, I had to use outlook to open a whopping 73 new message windows, but it refused to create a 74th, giving the same error message as on my other machine. At this time, the other symptoms are present as well.

Looking at process explorer system information, *none* of the stats changed significantly before and after opening 73 new message windows. The biggest change was Current/Limit commit charge went up from 62.94% to 63.88%, clearly not a factor. On this machine kernel memory shows 84/360 Paged Virtual usage, which blows my theory about fragmented kernel memory out of the window. The operations I'm performing place little or no demands on kernel memory.

I submit that *anyone* can reproduce this, using Outlook 2003 with Wordmail enabled (probably any application will do, it's just a matter of stressing it a bit). Just create new messages until it won't do it anymore (sometimes it can't even display the inaccurate error message dialog). At this point you can play around with the system and observe other symptoms. But now the challenge: figure out what "resources" it is running out of. Process Explorer can't seem to tell you.

Clearly, not being able to create 75 new message windows isn't a big deal. But it's useful being able to reproduce this on demand, so I can have a chance figure out what is preventing me from creating even one when I need to.

Thanks,
John


"Bob I" <birelan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23lAuKm2eGHA.4828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

My money is on the "temporary internet files" "folder", try clearing that and see what happens.

johndog wrote:

I have a frustrating recurring problem on my machine, running XP SP2, of apparently running out of memory or system resources, when as far as I can tell there should be plenty of them.

I have 1GB of memory, and use a 1.5GB swap file (I've set a limit at 2GB). When the problem shows, Process Explorer typically shows VM at around a 50% committed state, and shows that plenty of physical memory is available (100+MB). It shows the kernel pools decently far from their limits (Paged 130/160MB, Non-Paged 38/210MB). And my hard drives all have at least 5GB free. Again, these stats are taken as I am looking at an error message that says an application couldn't do something.

To trigger the problem, I can do something like the following:

- Fill the taskbar with my typical array of programs; a couple of IDEs and source editors, Microsoft outlook, some build windows, MSDN, 5-6 IE windows, etc.
- In outlook, Hit Ctrl+N to create a new message 5-6 times until it yields an error that is presumably due to running out of resources (the error message is usually more ambiguous).

At this point, I can launch practically nothing in the system successfully. I can launch a script, but createprocess on cmd.exe will fail, usually due to an obscure reason like a failure to load a DLL. I can launch task manager, but it may fail, or it may create the main window with controls or entire tabs missing. Windows may fail to paint, etc, etc.

With all the windowing issues, I used to suspect driver involvement (since supposedly GDI has no limits in XP), but when cmd.exe fails to create, I have to conclude it's even closer to the kernel than that.

I've read that the kernel has a virtual memory limit that is calculated on bootup, and not dynamically resizable. Is it possible the kernel memory is so insanely fragmented at this point that it can't satisfy basic program needs? Is the 30MB clearance (nearly 20%) possibly not enough? Are there any tools that will show or visualize virtual memory fragmentation?

What else could the problem be?



Thanks,
John




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups (v2)
    ... I thought I addressed some of those by adding a separate config option. ... I am not against making it a separate controller. ... Trying to account/control physical memory or swap usage via virtual ... you suggested that VA limits provide a "soft-landing". ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • SUMMARY: Out of Memory Message in Huge amount of Files
    ... reads in the directory information, it has to sort it, since it's not in any ... memory to hold the name strings (as well as the node numbers and some other ... Another is to relax the memory limits. ... and data space in shell scripts where I need to use "ls" in directories with ...
    (Tru64-UNIX-Managers)
  • Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups (v2)
    ... Trying to account/control physical memory or swap usage via virtual ... you suggested that VA limits provide a "soft-landing". ... memory controller configured. ... example would work for free if they were two separate subsystems. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Maximum filesize?
    ... I found some information on Charles Williams's site concerning Memory Limits ... Excel 2003 has a substantially increased memory capacity I have successfully ... to save the backup copy. ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions)
  • Odd Machine Crashes
    ... There are some odd messages coming from named and the machine is ... obviously running out of memory. ... I've since started limiting the resources of class daemon and running ... Resource limits for class daemon: ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)