Re: two web-based news reader warts



Win2K newsgroups found in web-based news!

Win2K General: http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/newsReader.aspx?lang=en&cr=US&dg=microsoft.public.win2000.general&sloc=en-us

English > Server > Windows Server > Windows Server (Older Versions) > Windows 2000 > ...
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Shell/User, Security), Aumha.org VSOP, DTS-L.org


PA Bear wrote:
No one here can address those issues, WC. I suggest you use the support
options here instead:
http://support.microsoft.com/contactussupport/?ws=support

It is indeed amazing that no Win2K newsgroups can be found in any of the
Windows subgroups at http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx.

wyocowboy wrote:
> A newbie to the Community Newgroups posted a Windows 2000 Prof
> workstation question to the XP General group using the web newsgroup
> reader because he could not find the
> microsoft.public.win2000........... groups associated with the win2k
> workstation in the navigation pane under English - Windows - Windows
> (older versions). The win2k workstation type groups used to display in
> the navigation pane, so could someone fix that? It is not terribly
> intuitive to have to browse into the win2k server groups for a
> workstation question. A second annoyance...
>
> When clicking on the link in the email notification of a thread update,
> it properly or improperly takes you directly to the thread. However,
> you are not signed in, so when you click 'reply' you are taken to the
> sign in page. However, after signing in, one is kicked back out the the
> home newsgroup page
> (http://support.microsoft.com/newsgroups/default.aspx). Then you have
> to click on the emailed link again, or use other means to get back to
> the thread so that you can again click 'reply' and post. I had reported > this second issue once before, and it had been fixed, but
> the same usability wart is back. Since the link in the notification says
> 'read the response' logging in prior to reading the update would not
> seem to be required, but it would seem trivial to return to the thread
> after logging in - at least it had been working that way after I
> reported this the first time, and this is the way that other web-based
> forum/group readers do it.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is Windows XP slower than 2000?
    ... >The more you use Windows XP, ... >Description of the Disk Cleanup Tool in Windows XP ... *** NT4 vs Win2k ... in memory. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers)
  • RE: windows NT to Win2K3 with Exchange 5.5 to Exchang 2K3
    ... Upgrade your win2k domain to win2k3 domain. ... attributes and permissions necessary to support the Windows Server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • Re: Spyware and Adware affect every internet user
    ... Win2K is still supported. ... So is Windows 98 but neither are hardly considered current. ... adware, no trojans, no rootkits, no homepage hijack?! ... been marketed as a webbrowser from a real webbrowser, ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: hijacking my system not Windows 2000 professional
    ... >> I actually like Win2K to some extent ... > That's the worst of windows in my opinion ... Wouldn't mind playing with a dual-core SLI machine, but my existing AMD64 ... It was great having a couple of servers and several workstations to ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: limiting download access
    ... MSM, and or stop them form using them? ... Windows 2000 has Group Policy. ... There are Win2k newsgroups and you should post any questions about that ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)