Re: Uncrackable Passwords
- From: "PopS" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:47:43 -0400
"Computer Guru" <ComputerGuru@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23cpciuXXGHA.1228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,
For those of you paranoid about their security, this is the
perfect document
for you. My company just finished publishing this whitepaper,
and we've
launched it
on our forums in hopes that it will make your PC more secure.
As a matter of
fact, we can guarantee it will!
Guarantee: How? What is your company? Where is the forum
located? Seems like you should have that info all right here.
====> Do you mean "base 68", or "based on" a length of 68
Abstract:
"Every password today, no matter for what application or what
it secures, is
built on a base of 68 "letters" or characters.
characters?
Long passwords can easily surpass 68 characters and some do.
Some applications use less,
but none use more. Brute force password cracking has become====> "none use more"? Someone needs to do further research
more and more
there. <g>
viable due to the exponentially increasing power of individual====> Brute force is more or less old fashioned nowadays. There
machines and
the even greater power of the government's cluster servers,
making it now an
easy and fast way of recovering any password.
are much more elegant methods being used today.
====> "no one knows about"?? THAT is a statement from a white
But there is a solution. There are more than 1,000 other
letters that no one
knows about!
paper? That's a strange white paper, indeed! Besides, it would
never call them "letters"; this is obviously phoney.
With these extra letters, it is possible to make passwords that
are, for all practical purposes, uncrackable!"====> Much shorter passwords, "for all practical purposes" are
equally or more "uncrackable". In reality, it wouldn't take all
that long for just a couple of machines to crack a password with
simply 68 "letters". A permutation is no more than that: A
permutation.
Based on the credibility level of this post, I would not visit
Link: http://www.neosmart.net/forums/index.php?gettopic=10
*PS If you like it, please register and leave a comment... we
could do with
the traffic
that site with an anonymous browser behind an anonymous browser
located in Chian and routed through thirteen servers and 128
hops.
Besides, doesn't look like you spent much time on that white
paper:
domain: neosmart.net
created: 12-Jul-2005
last-changed: 23-Mar-2006
registration-expiration: 12-Jul-2006
nserver: ns1.micfo.com 207.97.197.210
nserver: ns2.micfo.com 205.234.232.11
---
According to Google, you're only spamming (so far)
Microsoft.public newsgroups: I wonder why that is? Aren't
passwords imortant to other operating systems? I would think a
white paper would be more amenable to a different range of
targets.
Go figger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uncrackable Passwords
- From: Computer Guru
- Re: Uncrackable Passwords
- References:
- Uncrackable Passwords
- From: Computer Guru
- Uncrackable Passwords
- Prev by Date: Re: Migrating XP
- Next by Date: Re: Where are the scanned files?
- Previous by thread: Re: Uncrackable Passwords
- Next by thread: Re: Uncrackable Passwords
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading