Re: Ode to Kurttrail...

Leythos wrote:
In article <kvsl12h6an3nrb2ebskjt006aurr1uogir@xxxxxxx>, qbagrznvyzr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Leythos wrote:

In article <iknl12tp6no6uiovc807a4kof3qt7tv8e9@xxxxxxx>,
qbagrznvyzr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
When did Iraq kill any American after the first Gulf War?
Sadam was providing funding and materials to terrorists - he even said
so.
LOL! Now you are using Saddam as a source of information!

And you don't believe his taped meetings, his own words?

I think it just goes to show what your agenda is, since you don't want to believe that you could be wrong, since you would not accept that you're wrong no matter what evidence is presented, that would either make you very stupid or just looking to stir-up people because you have nothing better in your life.

And the sanctions & inspections worked good enough to rid Saddam of
WMDs by the mid-1990s!
Except that they were still there while we were going in this time...
Not according to BOTH of Bush's post-war WMD inspectors. Oops, I
guess you forgot about that!

Geeee, and many inspections showing chemical stock piles have been presented since we went in, even in some prime-time media outlets, but you seem to have forgotten those. I didn't forget anything, and you appear to have missed all the reports that said the inspectors were not permitted access to sites for days at a time, or the masses of trucks that left Iraq for Syria....


So when does the inspection/sanctions of the USA begin? We *know* the USA has the largest stockpile of WMDs in the world! Or is it a do as I say, not as I do situation? We also know that the USA has used WMDs in Iraq, Viet Nam and Japan. But God's on the USA's side so it's all right, right?

Alias

--
Use the "Reply to Sender" feature of your news reader program to email me.
Utiliza "Responder al Remitente" para enviarme un mail.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT - some perspective on history...
    ... but obviously not all) The reasons for attacking Iraq are known as well, and are public record for you and anyone else to see. ... And the administration's public statements on how to deal with Saddam were exactly the same after 9/11 as before, sure, 9/11 had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq. ... UN had loosened the sanctions and Saddam had rebuilt his military and restarted his WMDs efforts, but that wasn't the case in 2003. ... your insistance concerning facts about a situation based solely on your opinion is iritating as well... ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: OT Big surprise
    ... Except that without "getting control over WMDs" as STATED GOAL ... Saddam was the ONLY ... Now for the "humanitarian" factor - before the war IRAQ was SECULAR ... We gave power to pro-Iranian ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
  • Re: OT - some perspective on history...
    ... compete text of Bushs reasons for regime change in Iraq. ... WMDs, not Bush, not Cheney, no mentions of mushroom clouds, never happened. ... Saddam were exactly the same after 9/11 as before, sure, 9/11 had nothing to ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: 10 French Paras killed in Afgan Ambush
    ... And that Irak was unlikely to possess operational WMDs. ... Saddam may have looked the other ... Just too bad the occupation of Iraq was so badly bungled. ...
    (rec.aviation.military)
  • Re: OT Big surprise
    ... Except that without "getting control over WMDs" as STATED GOAL ... of the 2003 invasion that war simply would NOT happen. ... Saddam was the ONLY ... Now for the "humanitarian" factor - before the war IRAQ was SECULAR ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
Loading