Re: I want to legitimise my XP

If you really cared about people you would not hope people you have never
met "starve and dehydrate" (your words) You seem to only care for people
when it can hurt those you choose.

As for my feeling attacked, that is irrelevant whether I feel I am or not.
But it does suit your agenda to twist your need to attack people and
organizations. You do not know if I feel attacked but we do know from your
posts and website that you need to attack to make your point.

If you ever feel your message as presented by you can stand on its own, you
will let it. Until then in desperation you need to shore it up with
irrelevant attacks so typical of you.

"Really? Why? Because validation failed? LOL!"
The OP did not say but you are free to assume validation is the cause if you
need.
The OP has been given information to assist in finding the facts.
You should read what was written again for the first time.
We do not know who the thief is. You are assuming without the facts, so
typical of Kurt
"What may have happened..." and many other possible options. Until we hear
from the OP, I am not going to make assumptions.

You also assume it is not broken, we do not know either way from what the OP
has stated. Again more from Kurt to do nothing other to suit your anti
Microsoft agenda.

"And how do you know the seller didn't scam you?"
Irrelevant and typical of your diversions yet again.

I said "OP bought copyrighted material" then you said "Changing your tune to
suit your
need to cover up your hypocrisy!", not at all. It was a mistake in wording
on my part and you know it from past posts of mine.
The OP bought a license, whether it is valid or not will not be known
without more facts from the OP.

I don't want anyone to be victimized. No where did I suggest as much. But
your twisting to suit your agenda seems to need it.
If the OP bought what the seller did not have for sale, the OP may need to
buy it again.
If the sale was legitimate, another fix is in order.
Similar when stolen property is bought, the buyer needs to return the
property and go after the seller.
But as I have already stated, we lack the facts to determine if it is
legitimate or not.

Post back Kurt only to feed your ego since that is all your post will
achieve.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uVuRDufRGHA.1204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

Attacking others while providing nothing of value, so typical of you
Kurt.

ROFL! You feel attacked by someone pointing out your hypocrisy? How
typical of you!

The OP has reason to believe his is not legitimate.

Really? Why? Because validation failed? LOL!

Except for you true MS-diehards, everyone else has figured out that MS's
validation BS is flawed. It has so many false positives, while it doesn't
catch many truely pirated installs.

If the OP determines it is not legitimate, integrity suggests the OP
make it right.

Nope, my integrity is an extension of my common sense, and that says you
don't screw around with what ain't broken! Why? Because you are ten
times more like to break what wasn't broken in the first place.

You may choose not to buy what you use, but others have integrity.

The OP did buy it! What may have happened is that the seller didn't. MS
needs to go have the true theif not the victim! THAT'S WHAT INTEGRITY
DEMANDS!

I pay for the products I use when the seller determines the price.

And how do you know the seller didn't scam you? Or they were scammed by
the people that sold it to them?

With a crime, there must be an intent to commit one. The OP had no intent
on being scammed.

I never said groceries are the same as copyrighted material, but your
agenda again needs to change the meaning so you can make a point.

"What the local store does with the $ paid by the OP is not relevant any
more
than what the local grocery store does with your $ you pay for food."

OP bought copyrighted material, and it ain't the same as food.

HENCE COPYRIGHT LAW doesn't cover food!

Both are purchased prior to use.

LOL! I thought software was licensed? Changing your tune to suit your
need to cover up your hyprocisy! IOW using one hypocrisy to cover up
another!

That is really a true demonstration of YOUR INTEGRITY! ROFL!

So typical of Kurt, not understanding why people need to pay for
products they use.

The OP did, what is in question is whether the person or shop that sold it
to the OP did pay for it!

You dislike of Microsoft is obvious as is you lack of concern for
people.

I blame the real thieves and conartists, not their victims. You & MS want
to victimize the victims yet again!

It is yours & MS's lack of concern for people that have already been
victimized that is so damned obvious!

You pretend to care for people only as a means of your
constant attack on Microsoft and others otherwise you would not hope
for harm to those you have not met..

LOL! At least I don't want a victim to be victimized twice over the same
copy of software.

"kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:u1Ep5HfRGHA.4900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:

Do not confuse "mad" with integrity.

Exactly! MS has no integrity!

If the installed Windows is not legitimate integrity suggests the OP
make it right.

No. What MS calls legit isn't necessarily legit. Like their BS PA
message about how XP has been installed too many times, when it can
be installed as many times as one wants or needs.

Seems integrity is lost on MS, as they have left this message as a
part of PA since XP was in BETA!

What the local store does with the $ paid by the OP is not relevant
any more than what the local grocery store does with your $ you pay
for food.

Copyrighted material is not the same as physical groceries, and you
know it. Seems your integrity is pretty lacking too!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I want to legitimise my XP
    ... LOL! ... I don't consider pointing out the truth to be an attack of any kind. ... "If the installed Windows is not legitimate integrity suggests the OP ... wanting to victimize the victim a second time. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: I want to legitimise my XP
    ... LOL! ... Nope, my integrity is an extension of my common sense, and that says you ... MS needs to go have the true theif not the victim! ... and it ain't the same as food. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Possibility to cheat integrity checking?
    ... Yes integrity checking can be cheated. ... Attack the update process, that is to say when you install a new software ... For exmaple redhat ships tripwire, ... alerts via sendmail, Ibreak in and modify your sendmail, or the tripwire ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • Fags In The News - Bull Dyke Lesbos Extreme Gang Rape Investigated in California
    ... Detectives say the 28-year-old victim was attacked Dec. 13 after she ... indicating they knew her sexual orientation, ... Authorities are characterizing the attack as a hate crime but declined ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: HOW MEN ARE PUT DOWN AND HOW TO GET BACK UP!
    ... >> First attack non stop, ... >> Wait for the victim to get angry. ... Mothers have sons and husbands too. ...
    (soc.men)