Re: Microsoft Censorship PROVES it is a Corporate Scumbag!

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

kurttrail wrote:
ANONYMOUS wrote:

I can't understand why kurttrail hangs around on MS newsgoups.

Which other MS newsgroups am I supposed to be hanging around on,
other than this one?

I
would have thought that he would know by now that he is not wanted
on these Newsgroups.

LOL! Who cares what you want? This is supposedly a PUBLIC
newsgroup, though I'd say that that is just another MicroLie.

Hw would be better off messing around on this
website:

http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/excelzone/index.html

They know how to treat people like Kurttrail.

Bloody Bean Counters?! What are they gonna do, bore me to death?

kurttrail wrote:

http://microscum.com/censored/200602261226/

The above post was pulled from MS's Servers. MS has know since XP
was in Beta that their too many installations PA message is
confusing and misleading. That it is now 2006, and MS has yet to
change that message, is a clear indication that this is purposeful,
as changing the text of that message would be the easiest fix MS
would ever have to make. But nearly 5 years later, still the same
misleading message. If MS REALLY cared about its customers, that
message would have been changed long ago, but that nearly 5 years
has passed with MS doing absolutely NOTHING to change the message
is pretty much proof that this misleading message is totally
purposeful on Microsoft's part.

Instead of censoring me for pointing this out, if MS wants to
demonstrate that what I'm saying isn't the whole story, then CHANGE
THE EFFIN' MESSAGE! By censoring me, MS is showing that they'd
rather hide from the truth, than do what is right for its
customers!


--
Peace!
Kurt


Oh please, get over it. I use msnews.microsoft.com servers to get this
newsgroup. If I can't figure out that these are microsoft servers I
shouldn't be online. The posts are propagated to other servers but obviously
Microsoft has the right to nix any junk posts, dirty langauge posts, and
crazy off-topic rant posts on their servers if they feel it is appropriate
to do so.

If you want to talk dirty and rant go to one of the alt.windows newgroups.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Other groups...
    ... Am I correct in asuming that "Word Programing" is in fact ... The Web newsgroups and the NNTP newsgroups are mostly the same. ... they're hosted on different servers at MS, ... propagating posts in both directions. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.vba.general)
  • Re: Nobody proposing new uk newsgroups - why ?
    ... Number of newsgroups, posts, total volume? ... Either that or usenet is a magical spam free medium that has ... > new entrants, it will contract to subscription services and private servers, ...
    (uk.net.news.config)
  • Re: Blocking threats from USB storage device - *spam*
    ... I first found out about Newsgroups only *after* I had had my identity stolen ... | Do you know if anyone from MS monitors the posts on Usenet servers? ... Microsoft runs its own servers for the microsoft.public.* newsgroups (and ... and not all Usenet servers honor message cancellations. ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: Microsoft Censorship PROVES it is a Corporate Scumbag!
    ... Which other MS newsgroups am I supposed to be hanging around on, ... The above post was pulled from MS's Servers. ... obviously Microsoft has the right to nix any junk posts, ... If you want to talk dirty and rant go to one of the alt.windows ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Missing Posts
    ... > kurttrail wrote: ... The servers carry a finite number of ... >>> posts, so new posts displace older posts all the time. ... > FOAD Kurt. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)