Re: Microsoft Censorship PROVES it is a Corporate Scumbag!

kurttrail wrote:
http://microscum.com/censored/200602261226/

The above post was pulled from MS's Servers. MS has know since XP was in Beta that their too many installations PA message is confusing and misleading. That it is now 2006, and MS has yet to change that message, is a clear indication that this is purposeful, as changing the text of that message would be the easiest fix MS would ever have to make. But nearly 5 years later, still the same misleading message. If MS REALLY cared about its customers, that message would have been changed long ago, but that nearly 5 years has passed with MS doing absolutely NOTHING to change the message is pretty much proof that this misleading message is totally purposeful on Microsoft's part.

Instead of censoring me for pointing this out, if MS wants to demonstrate that what I'm saying isn't the whole story, then CHANGE THE EFFIN' MESSAGE! By censoring me, MS is showing that they'd rather hide from the truth, than do what is right for its customers!


Why can't you provide a clear explanation of your complaint without linking to a domain with a derogitory name?

Maybe the earlier messages were deleted because this site is operated by Microsoft to be allow people to assist each other instead of an oportunity merely complain. Some Usenet alt. or rec. group might be more accomidateing to articles that are merely rants. If your ISP doesn't offer a Usenet server, you can access them over the web through Google Groups.

Is this about a product refuseing to activate over an internet connection? If so, have you tried activating useing the toll free telephone number? If you used the toll free number were the representatives cooperative?

You are NOT enhancing your credabilty with the thinly disguised curseing in your message. We could have easily understood that portion of your displeasure with just "CHANGE THE MESSAGE!"
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Microsoft Censorship PROVES it is a Corporate Scumbag!
    ... The above post was pulled from MS's Servers. ... pretty much proof that this misleading message is totally ... Why can't you provide a clear explanation of your complaint without ... you mean speak did they speak American English? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: On Topic - setting up kill file.
    ... so can anyone recommend a kill file program that works with ... you seem to be using Google Groups. ... Free or very cheap Usenet/News Servers (note that free servers may ... http://www.albasani.net [Free, Germany based, very good spam filtering] ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: Rape Masters: Christian-evolutionists
    ... Most servers do not accept ... cancels. ... Then why does Google Groups offer the option? ... email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Why is this
    ... That generally is only honoured by google groups. ... honoured by participating news servers. ... Xananews newsreader request alone. ... If cancelling after a fair delay it will be there, ...
    (alt.guitar)
  • Re: Basic Question about EXE and DLL
    ... what about an ActiveX-Exe and a regular exe or ... > regular dll if that one is closer in comparison ?? ... >> It appears he is posting from Google groups, ... are not available on the MS servers. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)