why don't MS provide a default compiler on XP?
Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance
- From: "Jacky Luk" <jl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:59:12 +0800
Linux has gcc and g++
DOS has quick basic
How come Windows has got none?
Thanks
Jack
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: DOS Program running on Win XP
... Compatibility tab which will let you set some of these settings. ... "Jack" wrote in message ... >problem is that I have some legacy DOS based programs which the user will ... >need to run while they are being converted to a Windows based program. ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general) - Re: why dont MS provide a default compiler on XP?
... DOS has quick basic ... How come Windows has got none? ... Jack ... Steve N. ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general) - Re: why dont MS provide a default compiler on XP?
... DOS has quick basic ... You can find gcc and g++ versions that will run on Windows. ... Tim Slattery ... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general) - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FILE NAME ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
... adapter description file file name extension ... apple script to change file names ... batching file name changes in windows ... change short file names in dos ... (sci.misc) - Re: Linux syscalls
... > A device driver or a rewrite of DOS could permit this, ... really "DOS inside Windows" or "Windows inside DOS"? ... > DOS interrupts are revectored... ... if you re-write DOS to use the _Windows device drivers_ ... (alt.lang.asm) |
|