Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- From: "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:04:49 -0500
To slipstream means to take updated components and incorporate
them into an earlier or original version of the software. Essentially,
it allows you to take a XP Gold (Original) or SP1 disk and update
it into a SP2 level disk. For a Network share install point (i386) you
download the full Service Pack module, extract it into it's individual
modules and run the Update.Exe pointing it to the original i386.
Here's a Step-by-Step guide on Slipstreaming - But it's emphasis
is on creating a bootable disk, not a Network share i386.
http://www.theeldergeek.com/slipstreamed_xpsp2_cd.htm
SFC (System File Checker) is a component of Windows File
Protection. Whenever a program replaces a System module, SFC
quietly puts the "Official" version back. DllCache is the 1st place
that SFC looks to get it's replacement module. Normally, Dllcache
is around 400-500 Megabytes in size. Using the SFC /Purgecache
command empties the DllCache folder.
Microsoft's KB article on SFC basics:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;310747
"MikeLinPA" <MikeLinPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8D53A4D6-10F4-4E71-9EDD-89A3278AF818@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Pardon me, is my ignorance showing? I hate it when that happens..."
>
> I will have to read up on slipstreaming. I have heard the term quite a
> bit
> lately, mostly today in these forums!
>
> As for "simply using SFC with the qualifier /Purgecache", I don't know
> what
> you are referring to. If you please would be so kind as to point me in
> the
> right direction, I will start studying ASAP. There is obviously a gap in
> my
> self-taught windows education.
>
> Thank you very much for the quick reply.
>
> "R. McCarty" wrote:
>
>> Just slipstream your original i386 with the SP2 content. Then just
>> change the Registry key for ServicePackFiles to reflect the i386.
>> There's no reason to maintain both. You can also regain 500 Meg
>> per machine by either redirecting DllCache or simply using SFC
>> with the qualifier /Purgecache. It's not always necessary to keep
>> the DllCache fully populated.
>>
>> "MikeLinPA" <MikeLinPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:613C16C6-ECE3-47C6-A8E5-6128F0F8053A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Hi Everybody,
>> >
>> > I hope this is in the correct forum. There does seem to be some topic
>> > overlap. Please excuse me if I am not posting in the correct one.
>> >
>> > I am trying to get a little more life out of a fleet of older PC's
>> > running
>> > Win'XP SP2. They mostly have 6.4 GB Hard drives and they are really
>> > hurting
>> > for space. I have already done many of the suggestions posted in
>> > preivious
>> > threads. I have the original (Win'XP SP0) i386 folder on a network
>> > server
>> > instead of on the c drive. I have deleted the contents of
>> > "*\SoftwareDistribution\Downloads", the uninstall files in the Windows
>> > folder, and a few other things. I have now stumbled onto the
>> > "C:\Windows\ServicePackFiles\i386" and I was wondering a few things.
>> >
>> > For when the system asks for the Windows CD: Does it matter if I use
>> > the
>> > original i386 folder (which is what they have now,) from the original
>> > XP
>> > SP0
>> > CD, or should I always replace them with the i386 folder from a Win'XP
>> > SP2
>> > CD?
>> >
>> > Also, since I see there is the "C:\Windows\ServicePackFiles\i386" that
>> > SP2
>> > left behind, could I simply point the registry to that i386 folder for
>> > all
>> > install needs? (in other words, do I need both?) Pointing the
>> > Registry
>> > to a
>> > network server for system files is slower than a local copy, especially
>> > for
>> > the remote sites.
>> >
>> > Since there are some differences in size, I imagine there are
>> > differences
>> > in
>> > the files themselves. If I do need both, could they be combined, with
>> > the
>> > newer files replacing the older versions with the same name? (One
>> > pasted
>> > over the other?) All unique files from either would be contained in
>> > the
>> > new
>> > hybrid. Would that suffice?
>> >
>> > Any other ideas on the same line of thinking will also be greatly
>> > appreciated. Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Michael Lashinsky
>> > mikelinpa@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- From: MikeLinPA
- Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- References:
- Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- From: R. McCarty
- Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- From: MikeLinPA
- Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cookies
- Next by Date: Re: Can I Edit and/or Delete Windows Update History Entries
- Previous by thread: Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- Next by thread: Re: What is the difference in the various i386 folders?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|