Re: .bat vs .cmd
- From: "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:14:44 -0700
Mostly backward compatibility but see this discussion for some detailed
differences.
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.win2000.cmdprompt.admin/browse_frm/thread/5c7794abca1edb09?q=group%3Amicrosoft.public.*+insubject%3ADifference+insubject%3Abetween+insubject%3A.cmd+insubject%3A%26+insubject%3A.bat+insubject%3Afiles&hl=en&;
--
Regards,
Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect
"jda" wrote:
| Hi
| Is there someone who can tell me the actual difference between files with
| .bat and .cmd extensions other than .cmd will not run under win9x systems.
| I have tried microsoft.com and a lot of googleling but have not yet found
| an answer other than being recommended to use .cmd when scripting for XP
| --
| Jakob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: .bat vs .cmd
- From: jda
- Re: .bat vs .cmd
- References:
- .bat vs .cmd
- From: jda
- .bat vs .cmd
- Prev by Date: Re: How Do I Boot to Desktop Bypassing Password Window
- Next by Date: Re: Good 200Gb Hard Drive for Dell8200
- Previous by thread: Re: .bat vs .cmd
- Next by thread: Re: .bat vs .cmd
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
