Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:11:17 -0400
Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:umLd2y9sFHA.3188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>> message news:%23fE5x%238sFHA.304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
>>>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>> message news:%230x3wzxsFHA.4052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
>>>>>>> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:%23scZTqvsFHA.2064@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> You put that in quotes like I said that! Please give the
>>>>>>>> Google link to the post I said that, or you will be guilty of
>>>>>>>> false witnessing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! Can't recognize a biblical quote, huh? No one could ever
>>>>>>> accuse you of having read and understood the scriptures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So then it makes no sense, since I've never said there is no God.
>>>>>> Do you often quote scripture that is totally out of context to
>>>>>> the conversation?
>>>>
>>>> Is this how you are taught to witness for your religion, to ignore
>>>> answering the questions of others?
>>>>
>>>> So much for letting your light shine! Your actions show you are
>>>> ashamed, and you hide your light under a bushel!
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that
>>>>>>>>> come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him,
>>>>>>>>> and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually
>>>>>>>>> discerned."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't you think that people can be spiritual, in general,
>>>>>>>> without believing in a specific religion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Being spiritual and believing in the one true God and living in
>>>>>>> truth are different things entirely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To you. Not even all Christians believe in the same things you
>>>>>> do. Spirituality is totally relative, with NO ONE knowing what
>>>>>> is the truth.
>>>>>>>> Religions are man-made after all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I guess you agree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can't tell what a steak tastes like until you actually
>>>>>>>>> taste one for yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep. So?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Logic seems to be wasted on you, surprise!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some witness for your God you are! You can't even explain
>>>>>> yourself when asked!
>>>>>
>>>>> My actions speak for my faith in Jesus, you see, I live the faith
>>>>> I espouse.
>>>>
>>>> Really? Your actions here seem to suggest otherwise, as I've
>>>> already shown.
>>>>
>>>>> My faith is exercised more than once a week on Sunday for a
>>>>> few hours. What do your actions speak for?
>>>>
>>>> A reasonable man. One that knows the difference between belief and
>>>> knowledge. One that doesn't wear his personal spiritual beliefs on
>>>> his sleeve for everyone to see. You still don't know a thing about
>>>> my own personal spiritual beliefs, but I'll tell you this much, I
>>>> do have personal spiritual beliefs. I just don't believe in
>>>> religions, as religions are wholly man-made and totally corrupted
>>>> by man.
>>>
>>> Reasonable? LOL! True knowledge comes from belief, one cannot
>>> exist without the other.
>>
>> Wrong. Knowledge comes from reasonable belief.
>>
>>> It's a shame that you hide your beliefs.
>>
>> I don't hide anything. I just don't go around proselytizing. If
>> asked, I will answer.
>>
>>> You
>>> see, Jesus commanded his followers to preach the gospel to all
>>> people in all of the world.
>>
>> And you KNOW this because you read it? How do you know it is a
>> piece of fiction? God spoke to you and told you? If so, how do you
>> know that was God, and not devil fooling you? ;-)
>>
>>> You want to call that "wearing beliefs on ones
>>> shirtsleeves", so be it.
>>
>> No, I call that belief in something that is irrational. You have no
>> idea what he had to say, all you know is what has been attributed to
>> him in the first four books of the New Testament.
>
> I'll requote what I did earlier (remember this is the scripture I'm
> quoting, not you as you erroneously implied in an earlier post): "The
> man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from
> the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot
> understand them, because they are spiritually discerned."
Why would this matter to me any more the words written in Peter Pan?
Both the were written by humans.
> If I didn't know better I'd swear this was written specifically for
> you.
Who said you know anything?
>>> It is simply what Jesus commanded.
>>
>> First of all, "Jesus" who? There was no Jew that went around calling
>> himself "Jesus" nearly 2000 years ago. "Jesus" is a Greek name, not
>> the name of a Jewish man born in Nazareth, or Bethlehem!
>
> Time to do a little studying as you are wrong again. "Jesus" is not
> Greek, it is the Latin translation of the Greek "lesous". The Greek
> word is the transliteration of the Hebrew word "Jehsua". There you
> have it, it was Jesus all along like I've been trying to tell you.
Actually "Yeshua," or a shortened version of Yehoshua. Which in English
is more properly translated to the name Joshua, not the latin
transliteration of the greek "lesous".
Needless to say, you call your saviour by his rightful name in his
language or yours.
>> More than likely the first person to call him "Jesus" was Saul of
>> Tarsus, a man who NEVER knew him.
>
> Wrong again, before his birth his name was spoken by the angel (see
> Luke 1:30-31 - this is like the links you keep demanding).
LOL! Luke was written in Greek! It doesn't say his real name!
>
>> So if you don't even call him by his REAL name, how do you know what
>> he commanded anyone to do.
>
> I've already demonstrated I know his name. Your arguments are just
> silly but that's what you do.
Is the dead language of Latin your primary language?
>
>>> Your
>>> issue is not with me, but with the Lord.
>>
>> My issue is not with him, but those who CLAIM to follow him, but
>> they know him not!
>
> I know Jesus as my Lord and Savior. Do you?
You have faith that he is.
>
>>> You should take it up with
>>> Him, perhaps you'll come to know him as your Lord and Savior.
>>
>> Send him over, and we'll talk about it over a couple of pints of
>> Guinness!
>>> One
>>> can only hope and pray.
>>
>> No, only you religious types need to hope and pray that your faith
>> isn't misguided.
>>
>> I have no faith to be misguided, as all faith is, is the ability to
>> fool one's self into believing any irrational thing.
>
> Exactly as I thought, you are faithless as you admit.
Yep. I don't fool myself that my beliefs that don't have a basis in
reason are knowledge.
A wise man knows that irrational belief is not knowledge.
> It's no wonder
> that you are such a rude, contentious, and condescending person.
LOL! Mat 7:1-5 - Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what
judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it
shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is
in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own
eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out
of thine eye; and, behold, a beam [is] in thine own eye? Thou
hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt
thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
So much for you following the commands of you savior.
> With no faith you can't have any hope for your eternity.
What do you know about eternity? What you read?
> It's very
> sad, God's grace is offered up to you free-of-charge and yet you
> reject it.
LOL! The bible and its stories were written by men.
> It's there for you, Jesus died for you too.
And how do you know that? And the Bible is not a credible source, and
neither are the voices in your head!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- References:
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: George
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: kurttrail
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- Prev by Date: Re: Buffer Overrun In JPEG Processing Question
- Next by Date: missing files since broadband connection
- Previous by thread: Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- Next by thread: Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|