Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:16:16 -0400
Peter A. Stavrakoglou wrote:
> "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> message news:%23NdEfM%23sFHA.3908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Leythos wrote:
>>> In article <uV3l2$9sFHA.3864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <#OqEli9sFHA.1136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>> dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>>>>>> LOL! My problem is that what you hear, and what you spin it
>>>>>> into, are more than likely two totally separate and distinct
>>>>>> things.
>>>>>
>>>>> I posted the link to the N/O disaster document on the N/O website
>>>>> - have you read it? It's very interesting if you are really
>>>>> wondering what they had planned and what the said they would do
>>>>> and what they obviously didn't do.
>>>>
>>>> And I haven't disputed that the link you gave is the NO emergency
>>>> plan. What I still waiting for is you quoting the specific parts of
>>>> the plan you claim wasn't followed and then quotes & links to
>>>> credible news sources that support your claims.
>>>
>>> Have you read it?
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>>> If you can't at least take the time to look at the
>>> document then you don't need to keep suggesting that it was the
>>> FED's that are at fault here.
>>
>> I never claimed that the FEDs were at fault for not following the
>> plan. They are at fault for there negligent response when NO devolved
>> into
>> total choas.
>>
>>> Kurt, I know, even though you are hard to talk with, you can easily
>>> read the document, even if you skim through it you can find the
>>> parts about EVACUATION and the plan/methods, then you'll start to
>>> see things a little clearer.
>>
>> I'm not a mind reader. If you have specific claims to address then
>> you need to express them. I've already stated that the local &
>> State gov't deserve a share of the blame.
>>
>>> The nice thing is that you won't need any other links - the source
>>> document for all the planning and what should be done is fully
>>> available to the public and is even online for you to read. Take
>>> just a fraction of the time you spend hammering Government and read
>>> it for yourself - you can then be your best judge of what went
>>> wrong.
>>
>> I have and I am. But that the local and State gov't didn't do
>> everything right, in no way absolves the federal gov't for its
>> failures.
>>>
>>>>> Here is a link to another site that explains what the good
>>>>> governor didn't do, and it covers several years worth of inaction.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007219
>>>>
>>>> Who is Bob Williams? He is certainly not a credible news source.
>>>
>>> I never suggested he was credible to you, only that it's another
>>> person that has read the document, listened to the Govenor's
>>> statements, and came to the same conclusion as many of us that don't
>>> have ANY political agenda.
>>
>> LOL! Mr. Williams definitely has a political agenda, same as yours.
>
> ...and your political agenda makes you a reliable source, LOL!
LOL! Am I offering myself up as a source of any kind?
> Admit
> it, all you want is to be contentious with anyone who disagrees with
> you (most people are in that group I would bet).
I'm just trying to get Leythos to specifically show what he is talking
about.
> Your posts
> demonstrate that you are contentious and condescending.
Poor baby, feels he is being condescended to! ROFL!
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
.
- References:
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: kurttrail
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- From: Peter A. Stavrakoglou
- Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- Prev by Date: RE: user profiles
- Next by Date: Re: Paint's Send
- Previous by thread: Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- Next by thread: Re: {{{{[[[[Kelly & Family]]]]}}}} (was Re: messages on server not available)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading