Re: xp reactivation after mobo change


"Donald McDaniel" <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lp12h116o4uujj3ok063tqilrsr3qhfm2n@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:40:36 +0200, "Alias"
> <aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Donald McDaniel" <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1dvug1dfgr11bcnfmk2db6p1u1a97kano7@xxxxxxxxxx
>> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:44:05 +0200, "Alias"
>> > <aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Donald McDaniel" <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> >> >> When either activation or WGA doesn't work for you, get back to me.
>> >> >> It
>> >> >> has
>> >> >> nothing to do with maturity, you moron! Being considered guilty
>> >> >> until
>> >> >> proven
>> >> >> innocent is an insult. Period.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Alias
>> >> >>
>> >> > Sir: ONLY a court of law can convict a person of guilt or innocense.
>> >>
>> >> Do you have a reading comprehension problem? I said that MS ASSUMES
>> >> YOU
>> >> ARE
>> >> GUILTY, not me, you moron! They ASSUME ONE IS GUILTY OF PIRACY UNTIL
>> >> ONE
>> >> PROVES OTHERWISE by activation and WGA.
>> >
>> > OK, prove it publically! I will certainly change my mind about
>> > Microsoft if you can PROVE (with internal documentation from MICROSOFT
>> > or a finding by a court of law) what you just said.
>>
>> Reading comprehension isn't your only problem. You also have a problem
>> with
>> logic. Why should I have to prove I bought something twice when I have
>> the
>> receipt for payment over in the drawer?
>
> No, "alias" you are the one with reading comprehension problems: I
> was referring your bold-faced lie that Microsoft automatically assumes
> all are guilty of piracy, above: Prove that Microsoft automatically
> considers all guilty of piracy until one proves it otherwise.

Activation and WGA, by definition, assume you have a pirated copy until you
prove otherwise by activating or passing the WGA test.
>
> Microsoft is not trying to weed out the LEGITIMATE license-holders
> with Product activation. They are trying to weed out the illegitimate
> licenses. To do this, they MUST check ALL keys without exception,
> since they have no record connecting an individual key with a
> legitimate license holder's name.

Like I said, only paying customers are affected. The pirates have cracked PA
and WGA.
>
> They DO have a list of pirated keys, or keys known to be pirated at
> one time or other, or keys which are used to attempt activation when
> the Activation record for that particular key is flagged as being
> already used to install on a machine with a different hardware profile
> than the hardware profile of the machine currently attempting to
> activate.

You don't have to convince me that the process is lame.
>
> So a part of Product Activation is a check of ALL keys against that
> list, plus other algorithms. Those which do not pass the test are
> rejected, while those which do pass it are activated, or go on to
> further algorithms.

Again, pirated copies have the PA cracked so the only people inconvenienced
and who can come up with a false positive are paying customers.
>
>
>> > Product Activation ACTUALLY assumes that ALL product keys of XP are
>> > LEGITIMATE, not ILLEGITIMATE. You just got it backward. Not
>> > completely your fault. You just lack a little knowledge and
>> > understanding about Microsoft Product Activation.
>>
>> BS. If they assumed all were legitimate, no PA would be necessary.
>> Meanwhile, the pirates just laugh and burn another copy.
>
> No, if YOU assumed that all were legitimate, no PA would be necessary.
> However, not all users of Windows are as honest as you.

The dishonest ones have cracked copies of pirated XPs and are not affected.
>
> For whatever reason, Microsoft has decided that it is necessary
>
>
>> > (By the way, Product Activation has been found to be COMPLETELY legal.
>> > I assure you, Microsofts' legal department would have reseached case
>> > law VERY, VERY carefully before instituting the process. Not only
>> > that, but MANY software developers are starting to require Product
>> > Activation or other means of authentication of some sort.)
>>
>> BS. PA has never been challenged in court. You're back pedaling big time
>> now.
>> >
>> > Tell me, WHY do you feel "insulted", as you call it? An insult can
>> > only touch you if there is ANY thing in you which responds to it.
>>
>> Having to prove, twice, that I bought something is insulting.
>
> Product activation does not check to see if YOU bought the license,
> they only check to see if the KEY is valid, since they have no
> personal information about you, unless you actually REGISTER the
> software after installing it. They don't care whether YOU bought the
> license or not. They only care that the key is valid. I don't even
> think that they have a record of which key was generated by the
> manufacturer for each copy of XP. They MAY have a record, though. I
> just don't know. If they did, it would make it really easy to check a
> license's validity. Just check each key against that list of valid
> keys.

Having to prove, twice, that I bought something is insulting.
>
> However, you know, and I know that MANY copies of XP have been
> casually copied, and distributed, either by real pirates, or your
> neighbor (this is an example: I am not specifically referring to YOUR
> neighbor here, since only God knows whether your actual neighbor
> casually copied Windows 9x or XP), because Windows 9x users did it a
> LOT. As long as it contains characters with correct numerical order
> and type, it is considered legitimate. Microsoft RIGHTLY assumed when
> XP was released, that people were going to try to casually copy it
> like they did with 9x. THOSE people made Product Activation
> necessary, not Microsoft.

There aren't any statistics to show which was pirated more, 9x or XP. There
ARE statistics that MS became filthy rich with 9x.
>
>> >
>> > For instance, I do not feel insulted that you have called me a "Moron"
>> > publically several times in this newsgroup, because I know I am not a
>> > moron.
>>
>> I should have rephrased that. You were and are acting like a moron. I
>> don't
>> know you well enough to know if you always act like that.
>
> How does a moron act? What are the symptoms of moronic behavior
> patterns? Are you a mental health professional? Are you a
> sociologist? Are you a Psychiatric Social Worker? Are you a
> specialist in abnormal psychology? What are your degrees? Where did
> you go to school? What schools did you attend? What is your true
> name, address, and phone number, so I can check them out.

You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows. If you want
the definition of "moron", look it up in the dictionary. My personal
information is none of your business.
>
> Until you can prove to me that you are qualified to make such
> judgments, I will continue to reject such attempted insults.

Wow, as if I care.
>
>>
>> > Now, when I was younger, I would have felt insulted, because I
>> > was puffed up with pride, like most younger adults and some older
>> > ones, too. I do admit that I still struggle with pride from time to
>> > time. After all, I am still a little immature myself. I certainly
>> > don't claim to being God or a wise man.
>>
>> Good thing.
>> >
>> > There is no room or need for pride in the heart of a mature person.
>> >
>> > Donald L McDaniel
>>
>> Really? Gosh, I always thought one should be proud of a number of things
>> like a job well done, caring for your customers and not driving them
>> crazy
>> with having to prove they're not thieves twice after paying for a product
>> but what the hell do I know, I don't believe in a god and I think that
>> Jesus
>> of Nazarath had a slew of kids with Magdalena and retired to the Kashmir.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Cody, there is a BIG difference between being "puffed up with pride"
> and being proud of your accomplishments, as long as you report that
> God helped you perform them, and are truly humble about your
> accomplishments.

God doesn't exist.

> The other kind of pride (false pride) originates
> with Satan, who thought that he could rise up to take God's Place on
> His Throne, or beside Him, thinking he was equal with God.

Satan doesn't exist.
>
> If you think within yourself tthat you are GREATER or BETTER than
> anyone else, you are puffed up with false pride. This is what I mean
> by "puffed up with pride".

Well, whoopy de doo. Are you puffed up with pride about it?
>
> By the way, did you know that the Bible (God's Book) tells us that
> only a fool believes there is no God.

Only fools believe in something that doesn't exist.
>
> Are you a fool, Cody?

No, you are. I suppose you also believe in the fairy that exchanges money
for body parts.

Alias
>
> Donald L McDaniel


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
    ... >> Microsoft if you can PROVE (with internal documentation from MICROSOFT ... with Product activation. ... They DO have a list of pirated keys, or keys known to be pirated at ... I do admit that I still struggle with pride from time to ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • RE: SBS SHared Printer Problem
    ... Does this issue happen for all the client workstations? ... If you try printing on the SBS server, ... Clear the registry keys and the driver on both the server and the client ... Microsoft Shared Fax Monitor ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS SHared Printer Problem
    ... They are shared from the server. ... please right click following registry keys and click ... Microsoft Shared Fax Monitor ... Install the latest driver for the printer and check if the issue ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Cant install Outlook 2003 upgrade on client
    ... corrupt .dll files or registry keys related to Office XP. ... uninstall Office XP including Outlook XP and other Office applications), ... In the Microsoft Office XP Setup dialog box, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: windows XP Professional
    ... >> Why do you need to activate windows? ... > Because Microsoft is a greedy and control-mad company. ... > Microsoft came up with product activation as a way of discouraging the ... Microsoft intends to implement a model wherein the customer ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)