Re: xp reactivation after mobo change

On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:41:31 +0200, "Alias"
<aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote:

>
>"Donald McDaniel" <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:8morg15r2c70nh86rn68c461cfck7bnk4b@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:45:04 -0400, "kurttrail"
>> <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Donald McDaniel wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:09:17 -0500, Greg Ro <webworm12@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:30:52 -0700, Donald McDaniel
>>> >> <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:44:04 -0500, Greg Ro <webworm12@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:46:31 -0700, Donald McDaniel
>>> >>>> <dlmcdaniel2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:05:01 -0400, "kurttrail"
>>> >>>>> <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Donald McDaniel wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> <snip>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>> The only "problem" I had with Linux was Linux itself. Anything
>>> >>> built by OpenSource is bound to be weak and subject to buggy
>>> >>> behavior.
>>> >>
>>> >> And windows does not have buggy behavoir?
>>> >>
>>> >> When I select mulitple files using xp sp1 or xp sp2
>>> >> I get a code 0xc0000005 error
>>> >>
>>> >> It is not spyware or adaware or a virus.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Greg Ro
>>> >
>>> > Greg, I really don't know why you receive that error. I never receive
>>> > an error after selecting multiple files, and I have XP Pro w/SP2
>>> > installed. In fact, I seldom receive an error not caused by my
>>> > ineptness.
>>> >
>>> > Maybe you should start a new thread about it, describing in detail
>>> > your error, every thing you do leading up to receiving the error, and
>>> > every thing you do until you receive the error, along with a detailed
>>> > description of your OS, Service Pack level, and computer hardware.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Do you count Greg as one of the MILLIONS made HAPPY by Windows? ROFL!
>>
>> Obviously, he is not happy at this time. What do you take me for?
>> However, happiness is very transient. A man can be happy one minute,
>> and unhappy the next, depending on the time of day, the weather, what
>> he sees out the window, how his wife is treating him, how his boss is
>> treating him, etc. And the other side is also true. He can be
>> unhappy one minute, and happy the next, depending on many factors.
>>
>> I never have had the problems with XP which Greg has reported.
>> I do not doubt him for one minute. However, I told him the truth,
>> that I personally have had no problems with XP which were not caused
>> by my own ineptness or lack of knowledge or understanding. I am also
>> sure, by the Laws of Chance (after all, XP has been distributed to
>> MANY MILLIONS of people), that the MAJORITY of Windows XP users are
>> more HAPPY with the product than UNHAPPY.
>>
>> Donald L McDaniel
>> Please reply to the original thread
>> so that conversations may be kept in order
>
>I, for one, am happy with the product. I am not happy with Activation and
>WGA as I believe it only affects paying customers and assuming guilt until
>proven otherwise is an insult.
>
>Alias
>

I never said I was happy or not happy for the record .
I can't see kurttrail post. He told me something I didn't like to
hear.

It possible one peace of software causing that problem or some tweak I
did or an the repair changed my CPU without my permission.

It is a problem with explorer.exe shell32.dll and shlwapi.dll

This does it even with xp sp1 and no updates installed.

Maybe ie 7 will fix this problem.


What I don't like about xp.
Is the activation and Wga things.
It won't run some of my older programs.
(I am not the type of person who goes out any buys the newest software
with each operating system)

I don't like the high picth noise my computer makes-yes this is after
I cleaned out the fan and the heat sinks.


I like 98se a lot better myself.

I do like somethings about xp and somethings I don't.



Greg R




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
    ... >> Donald McDaniel wrote: ... >> Do you count Greg as one of the MILLIONS made HAPPY by Windows? ... > unhappy one minute, and happy the next, depending on many factors. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: xp reactivation after mobo change
    ... > Donald McDaniel wrote: ... >> Greg, I really don't know why you receive that error. ... > Do you count Greg as one of the MILLIONS made HAPPY by Windows? ... unhappy one minute, and happy the next, depending on many factors. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Adequate Security
    ... Sounds good Greg. ... >> I think you will be fine with Norton CE and Windows XP Firewall ... >> Internet Security will also manage outbound access and if you think ... I bought it via web download and so ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: cant access add/remove Windows components
    ... Expand the missing infs using the same way, Greg. ... Ramesh, Microsoft MVP ... Windows XP Shell/User ... This file is the inf that drives the fax setup ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: cant access add/remove Windows components
    ... You're welcome Greg. ... Ramesh, Microsoft MVP ... Windows XP Shell/User ... >>> Ramesh, Microsoft MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)