Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?

From: "Detlev Dreyer" <detdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:41:23 GMT

"Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\)" <mike.hall.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The answer does follow the question when top posting, assuming that
> one has read the previous post..

That's correct, Mike - but that's somewhat cumbersome also. And this
may not work if the newsreader is configured to show unread messages
only.

--
d-d
.

References:
- Why reply at the bottom of posts?
  - From: ITinerant
- Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
  - From: Detlev Dreyer
- Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
  - From: Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\)

Prev by Date: DISABLE HARD DRIVE
Next by Date: Office XP SP3 won't install on W2K
Previous by thread: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
Next by thread: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Why you should never buy a car without a tachometer
... > in between so I can copy/paste it together and view the site? ... Or, much better and less cumbersome, make the long URL into a short one ... before posting it, by visiting www.tinyurl.com. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.autos.driving)
Re: The "NEW" Roland FR-7b reedless
... You seem to have changed your opinion of the Roland since your last ... posting. ... Mike O'R ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.music.makers.squeezebox)
Re: Anyone want to hear some hunting stories??
... that wrote me some hate mail about posting them. ... Mike ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.models.scale)
Re: "Ballpark estimates made without data on area, design"
... the WT is strict on posting ... The Washington Post is not. ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.sport.baseball)
Re: Nizlopi
... > I've never been a cuntformist so posting a link in here to this site is ... > being totally non-cunformist to the football ethos of the froup. ... Mike ... Prev by Date: ...
(uk.sport.football)