Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- From: Ed <fake@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:35:15 -0400
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:48:15 -0700, "ITinerant" <rsvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>I'm just curious as to why so many replies are under the original post
>instead of at the top?
I've never understood why the whole messages being replied to is
brought forward as a quote. I think that is laziness whether posting
at the top or bottom.
I think the more intelligent way is to snip out the specific part(s)
one is replying to and post a specific reply to each specific part.
>Personally I find this annoying to have to scroll to the bottom to see the
>latest reply.
I find it even more annoying where people bring forward a quote
containing multi levels of quotes going back 10 or more messages and
then post a one sentence reply to it.... LAZY! or... they never
learned what copy&paste is or what the shortcut ctrl-c and ctrl-v is
used for.
>This isn't meant to be a mean spirited question.
And it wasn't taken as such, or wasn't by me at least....
Regards,
Ed
>Quote
>>Quote of Quote
>>>Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
>>>>>>>>>>Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote of Quote
See how utterly Stupid it is?
.
- References:
- Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- From: ITinerant
- Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Next by Date: multi pc installations
- Previous by thread: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Next by thread: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading