Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- From: "Mike Hall \(MS-MVP\)" <mike.hall.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:04:43 -0400
The old Usenet rule was that one answered underneath such that readers could
see what was being answered.. I always read all of the way through, or if
following up, tend to remember what has already been stated.. so I prefer
top posting.. usenet purists dislike it, but hey..
--
Mike Hall
MVP - Windows Shell/User
"ITinerant" <rsvp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eLU4GMToFHA.3152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
> I'm just curious as to why so many replies are under the original post
> instead of at the top?
> Personally I find this annoying to have to scroll to the bottom to see the
> latest reply.
> In fact, I usually go on to the next post when I'm just lurking.
>
> What news reader are folks using that does this?
>
> This isn't meant to be a mean spirited question.
>
> / ITinerant
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- From: NoStop
- Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- References:
- Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- From: ITinerant
- Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Prev by Date: RE: firewall not working
- Next by Date: Re: XP
- Previous by thread: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Next by thread: Re: Why reply at the bottom of posts?
- Index(es):