Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- From: "kurttrail" <dontemailme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:57:16 -0400
Steve Rollins wrote:
> NoStop you really are retarded!!!
>
> If you bothered to do any research into what you are posting you
> would find that linux vulnerabilities are on the up (yes it's true).
> The only reason you don't here to much about them is because Linux is
> an OS that has not been widely deployed.
>
> Go to www.securityfocus.com, select vulnerabilities, filter that by
> Linux and see how many faults there really are with Linux.
>
> Next you'll be saying firefox is a better browser than IE because it
> is more secure, but as with the rest of your posts that'll be wrong
> to because there really are vulnerabilities in that to. If you can
> provide proof that Linux or Macs are any more secure than Windows
> please bring your proof to the table and I'm sure we'll all bow
> before your extensive knowledge.
>
> If you can't provide the proof, then f**k Off back to crayons and
> colouring books and stop posting the bull that you do. If you really
> hate Microsoft and it's products stay off the sites.
>
>
>
> "NoStop" wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 11 August 2005 12:42 am, NoNoBadDog! had this to say in
>> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:
>>
>>>
>>> "NoStop" <nostop@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:UKAKe.184953$%K2.117647@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Read article here ...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eetimes.com/showPressRelease.jhtml?articleID=X353718
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Have you been MicroShafted today?
>>>> To mess up a Linux box, you need to work *at* it.
>>>> To mess up a Windows box, you need to work *on* it.
>>>
>>> Sorry to see your stupid, lame excuse for wasting oxygen back on the
>>> newsgroups.
>>>
>>> For the uninitiated, NoStop couldn't find his own a** with both
>>> hands and a
>>> map. He has never once given a correct piece of advice, and seems
>>> to think he knows everything.
>>>
>>> Bobby
>>
>> Nice to see all the Wintards jump to the defence of MickeyMouse.
>> Only a Wintard would be content to pay big money for an "o/s" as
>> full of holes and bugs as XP has been and then shoot at the
>> messenger because they're too stupid to shoot at the message.
>>
>> Agreed, that a lot of software contains bugs. But those are usually
>> fixed in a swift fashion or else the software ceases to be used.
>> Wintards on the other hand appear to be stupid enough to keep giving
>> Gate$ a chance to fix a lame product with patch after patch after
>> patch as they continue to struggle to keep their computers working.
>> What are we up to? SP #2 (each patch containing dozens of bug fixes)
>> and still more fixes coming down the pipe. This is almost 5 years
>> after this toy operating system was initially released! Consumers
>> deserve better and that is all the article is advocating.
>>
>> No need to be such apologists you guys. Anyone with any brains can
>> see you're just sheeple and part of the MickeyMouse Fan Club. When
>> the next poor souls come here and post the silly problems they're
>> having, just tell them it's what's expected when one runs Windoze.
>> Live with it! A fix will come ... eventually (more likely when you
>> cough up more money for the next version, so you can start the whole
>> game again). You'll be laughing stocks, as you so rightfully deserve
>> within the computing community - as your buddy Billy laughs all the
>> way to the bank.
>>
>> It's people like you, that bow to Redmond, that helps keep this
>> silliness afloat. Fortunately, many thousands are finally waking up,
>> have smelled the coffee, and have given up on MickeyMouse. The
>> MickeyMouse Fan Club is losing its members and eventually only you
>> fundamentalists will be left reading your KB articles wondering why
>> your computers are always crapping out on you even after you've
>> patched it for the umpteenth time. You all need to be thanking your
>> lucky stars that other developers (outside of M$) keep your
>> computers running at all. If it wasn't for anti-virus, anti-trojan,
>> anti-spyware programs, your lame O/S would bite the dust in the
>> first 5 minutes of a Net connection. I think it's time YOU stopped
>> apologizing for this. Grow some balls fellas.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Have you been MicroShafted today?
>> To mess up a Linux box, you need to work *at* it.
>> To mess up a Windows box, you need to work *on* it.
Windows is less secure just because it is installed on 95% of all PCs.
That means that all a malware writer has to do is target a vulnerability
in Windows and it can't help but hit thousands upon thousands of
computers at a minimum.
The biggest security hole in Windows isn't the number of vulernabilities
in the code, but the sheer numbers of PC installed with Windows.
--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
.
- References:
- Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- From: NoStop
- Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- From: NoNoBadDog!
- Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- From: NoStop
- Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- From: Steve Rollins
- Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- Prev by Date: Re: Where's our Bumper Sticker?
- Next by Date: Re: Real Player vs. Windows Media
- Previous by thread: Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- Next by thread: Re: Demand That 'Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
