Re: SFC ?
- From: "Wesley Vogel" <123WVogel955@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:48:15 -0600
You certainly have a valid point. :-)
I have Adapter Type GeForce4 MX 440, NVIDIA compatible.
Installed Drivers nv4_disp.dll
Driver Version 6.14.10.6177
I have...
nv4_disp.dll v6.14.10.6177
and
nv4_mini.sys v6.14.10.6177
I ran File Signature Verification (sigverif.exe), you can get to it from
System Information | Tools | File Signature Verification Utility, these
were all listed as Not Signed...
File Modified Version Status
------------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
nvcpl.hlp 15/Jul/04 None Not Signed
nvwcplen.hlp 15/Jul/04 None Not Signed
nv4_disp.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvcod.dll 15/Jul/04 1.0.0.15 Not Signed
nvcodins.dll 15/Jul/04 1.0.0.15 Not Signed
nvcpl.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvmctray.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvnt4cpl.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvoglnt.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvsvc32.exe 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nvwddi.dll 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
nv4_mini.sys 15/Jul/04 6.14.10.6177 Not Signed
--
Hope this helps. Let us know.
Wes
MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
In news:3A021742-38F0-4C63-BD13-0ECF45B59CC6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
beamish <beamish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hunted and pecked:
> Hello, First a disclaimer, have not read, studied about OS or the
> Hardware. Had a error in event viewer (event1000,module:netshell.dll,
> app.: explorer.exe), did not consider error as a real problem. First one
> in months. I did want to try and use sfc /? and sfc /scannow. Ran "sfc"
> installed the disc it requested and read the changes made in event
> viewer. Problem according to "sfc", "Bad Signature" changing the
> following files: nv4_disp.dll 6.14.10.6177 to nv4_disp.dll 6.14.10.5673
> and nv4_mini.sys
> 6.14.10.6177 to nv4_mini.sys 6.14.10.5673. Did not change any other
> files. There were two different driver files listed after sfc finished;
> the two above 5673 and the rest were 6177.
> Had 6177 on the system for 5/6 months "no problems". I made an assumption
> that at the time Nvidia first released 6177 it did not have a "digital
> signer" listing.
> The changes made by "sfc" to the video card driver caused the card to act
> odd, some features were no longer available.
> I removed the video driver and installed v 6177 from backup, works,
> Then downloaded a newer driver that has a "digital signer" .7772, works.
> This was the reason for my original question. Asking about the ability to
> see problems listed by "sfc" before "sfc" makes changes. I consider the
> "registry cleaner" comment not far out of line. I use Regseeker and
> JV16PowerTools for the last two years on a WindowsME and WindowsXP machine
> without problem.
> Apologize for the length of the post.
> Take Care.
> beamish.
>
>
>
>
> "Wesley Vogel" wrote:
>
>> *How* can SFC can be more of a danger then some "registry cleaners"?
>>
>> [[If System File Checker discovers that a protected file has been
>> overwritten, it retrieves the correct version of the file from the cache
>> folder (%Systemroot%\System32\Dllcache) or the Windows installation
>> source files, and then replaces the incorrect file. System File Checker
>> also checks and repopulates the cache folder. ]]
>> Description of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 System File Checker
>> (Sfc.exe)
>> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=310747
>>
>> [[Windows File Protection (WFP) prevents programs from replacing critical
>> Windows system files. Programs must not overwrite these files because
>> they are used by the operating system and by other programs. Protecting
>> these files prevents problems with programs and the operating system.]]
>> Description of the Windows File Protection Feature
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;222193
>>
>> HOW TO Verify That Windows File Protection Is Running
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;814597
>>
>>
>> --
>> Hope this helps. Let us know.
>>
>> Wes
>> MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
>>
>> In news:F2D192D8-BF54-444D-A1BC-D62F8730BE0F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> beamish <beamish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hunted and pecked:
>>> Hello, Thanks for the replies.
>>> I was hoping there was "something" that I could not find.
>>> In some ways SFC can be more of a danger then some "registry cleaners".
>>> Once again Thanks for the replies.
>>> Take Care.
>>> beamish.
>>> "Wesley Vogel" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that I know of.
>>>>
>>>> If SFC.EXE did anything it will be in the Event Viewer.
>>>>
>>>> Open the Event Viewer...
>>>> Start | Run | Type: eventvwr | OK |
>>>> Click System | Look at any Windows File Protection
>>>> entries
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hope this helps. Let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Wes
>>>> MS-MVP Windows Shell/User
>>>>
>>>> In news:49207471-0B4B-4B83-A3EF-9A955DED7CE9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>>> beamish <beamish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hunted and pecked:
>>>>> Hello, Can SFC be setup to run and only create a log file?
>>>>> Take Care.
>>>>> beamish.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SFC ?
- From: beamish
- Re: SFC ?
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: the system cannot find the file specified installing sp2
- Next by Date: Re: TURN OFF SYSTEM SPEAKER
- Previous by thread: Re: SFC ?
- Next by thread: Re: SFC ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
