Re: Bulletproof backup - how to test?



"deko" <deko@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aNyve.23$0V3.14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> A double failure from bad ram, bad controller, or bad power supply
>> is not unheard of.
>
> Okay, two more variables: bad controller and/or bad RAM
>
> Even IF both of these variables were to strike, AND my hard drive
> mechanically failed, I would just replace the motherboard (on which the
> SATA
> controller and RAM resides), buy a new system disk (or a new backup disk,
> depending on which one failed), reinstall the OS (if it was the system
> disk
> failed), and restore all my data from the good drive. Only a mechanical
> failure of both drives at the same time could cause data loss.
> Considering
> the MTBF of the drives and the statistical probability of both of them
> failing at the same time, I'd say that's bulletproof.
>
>

You really don't comprehend do you? Bad ram, controller or power supply
could easily corrupt both hard drives before the corruption is noticed. A
corrupt OS is probably the least likely reason why a backup would also
become corrupted. Your method of backing up is good for quick backups. It is
probably the least bulletproof of any backup method. Most knowledgable users
use a similar method for quick backups and another method less often for
redundancy.

Kerry


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Backup/Restore program (s), etc/misc info;
    ... to Full backup vs Full image. ... 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache ... Network Drives: ... Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Backup/Restore program (s), etc/misc info;
    ... backup all, including OS XP Home, but something in addition to ntbackup, in ... 512 kilobyte secondary memory cache ... Network Drives: ... Secondary IDE Channel [Controller] ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: Bulletproof backup - how to test?
    ... bad controller and/or bad RAM ... failure of both drives at the same time could cause data loss. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Temporarily going from RAID1 to single drive...
    ... > to my backup PC. ... > the data is stored in a RAID1 array. ... The HDDs are SATA drives. ... It's more important to know the RAID controller and look it up in the manual ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
  • Re: Temporarily going from RAID1 to single drive...
    ... my backup PC doesn't have RAID1 ... The HDDs are SATA drives. ... > It's more important to know the RAID controller and look it up in the ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)