Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: Gerhard Fiedler <gefiedler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:35:00 -0300
On 6/10/05 03:08:18, Edward W. Thompson wrote:
> Third party defraggers are not better than the WINXP native defragger
> unless running faster and having a pretty interface makes them better.
> From a functional point of view the WINXP native defragger is equal to
> all third party defraggers
Do you have some good facts to back this up? Or is it just a belief?
Gerhard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)
- Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: Bert Kinney
- Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- References:
- is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: Andrew
- Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: 1badtech
- Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- From: Edward W . Thompson
- is there a better XP Defrag..?
- Prev by Date: Re: History only shows today's sites visited
- Next by Date: Re: huge mistake!!
- Previous by thread: Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- Next by thread: Re: is there a better XP Defrag..?
- Index(es):
