Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- From: "Kelly" <kelly@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:09:48 -0500
<LOL> Where is Sarah when you need her?
--
All the Best,
Kelly (MS-MVP)
Troubleshooting Windows XP
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com
"Peter Foldes" <okf22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23tMM7TtaFHA.2444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
David
Sorry David about the above answer. I should have read it more precisely
..Like I said to Kelly my mind is starting to leave me.
I really enjoy these postings ,it breaks the monopoly . I am now and was
laughing at the whole thing and I find it very amusing and I am without
saying enjoying all of this plus the Neil UK thread. Kurt at least tells it
as he sees it and as it is. Must do this more often (being sarcastic a bit
here). Thank you for this lesson which I have forgot over the years in
groups.
Now if we could get Tick in here then that would make everything so much
more enjoyable. LOL
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"David Candy" <.> wrote in message
news:%23nfISOlaFHA.612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The ratbags are the scum in this thread. They are spreading their usual
lies. Like you most hide their identities.
I've been here longer than any of these pieces of ***.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
=================================================
"Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eRO1hMlaFHA.3384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Every country has its share of ratbags - and as you say this is one from
> here.
>
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23tBK9hkaFHA.2520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Actually no. The person is one of your own countryman from NSW
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "Oziebill" <oziebillREMXXXXXXXXXOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:OPlJnZkaFHA.3032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sarah????
> >
> >
> > "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> > news:ObvtTRkaFHA.1456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > You are an idiot. C&nts like you only want drive traffic to your site.
> >
> > 1. You are a grade A moron in thinking that MS has any committment to
> > NNTP.
> > FTP has been killed this year. You don't get it because you are stupid.
> > HTTP
> > allows ownership of the user.
> >
> > 2. You are so silly. F&ckin silly. Where does helpfulness come from. You
> > want people to jump through hoops. Note many people don't get help here
> > because If I can't attach a script then I won't help. Where do you c&nts
> > get
> > off advocating unuseability.
> >
> > 3. How does one post technical data. Ahh, I see, you slimy piece of ***
> > ***, you want to drive traffic to your web site.
> >
> > So what we have here is
> > 1. WRONG INFOMATION. These are binary groups.
> > 2. Decietful infomation to drive traffic to web sites that is IMMORAL.
> > 3. You don't give a toss for anyone here or you wouldn't be advocating
> > lies
> > to promote web site traffic at user expense.
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > http://webdiary.smh.com.au/archives/_comment/001075.html
> > =================================================
> > "Leythos" <void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.1d0d820ff5cb742f98989b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Candy" <.>
> >> says...
> >> > Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people.
> >> > Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and
> >> > feed
> >> > people through a web page. The web page doesn't show attachments (or
> >> > HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post technical
> >> > information as well as it's unreadable).
> >>
> >> MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
> >> competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts, as
> >> scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a plain
> >> text, not html.
> >>
> >> Usenet is not a HTML place.
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> remove 999 in order to email me
> >
> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- From: Oziebill
- Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- From: Peter Foldes
- Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- From: Oziebill
- Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- From: Peter Foldes
- Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- Prev by Date: Re: Baclup and reboot problem
- Next by Date: Re: Tracking shutdown and restart problems with XP Pro SP 2 all updates since.
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- Next by thread: Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.
- Index(es):