Re: Rude replies
- From: Larry <lhullz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:50:55 -0400
You tell 'em, Neil. I'm too mad.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:23:05 -0700, "Neil UK"
<NeilUK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>As a relatively new subscriber to this newsgroup, I wish to express my
>disgust that one or two people are replying to questions that have been posed
>by persons who are in difficulties by writing insulting and useless replies
>that do not help the person who posed the original queries. I myself am not
>in any way an expert: but when I see people who hold themselves out to be
>experts indulging in personal and scatological abuse of others, I say ENOUGH!
>
>Recently a person who calls himself Kurtrail and another who is called David
>Candy have, in my opinion, fallen below the standards that I believe should
>apply to a zone that should be dedicated to the pursuit of constructive
>excellence. This site should not be the ground for the dissemination of
>political or self-aggrandizing opinions.
>
>Nor have we been helped by the fact that it now appears that two different
>people are posting using the handle "Kelly". There is only one Kelly, so
>please will the spoofer get off the line. I assume that those who host this
>site will take notice of my remarks and take steps to regulate matters so
>that only constructive and not DE-structive messages are posted.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rude replies
- From: kurttrail
- Re: Rude replies
- References:
- Rude replies
- From: Neil UK
- Rude replies
- Prev by Date: Re: making apps run in a window
- Next by Date: RE: "Mail Message at Log In" resolved (sort of)
- Previous by thread: Re: Rude replies
- Next by thread: Re: Rude replies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
