Re: Is it OK to attach scripts to reply posts. I want to attach a handy script.

Oziebill wrote:
> Sarah????

Good One! ;-)

--
Mike Pawlak
>
> "David Candy" <.> wrote in message
> news:ObvtTRkaFHA.1456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You are an idiot. C&nts like you only want drive traffic to your site.
>
> 1. You are a grade A moron in thinking that MS has any committment to
> NNTP. FTP has been killed this year. You don't get it because you are
> stupid. HTTP allows ownership of the user.
>
> 2. You are so silly. F&ckin silly. Where does helpfulness come from.
> You want people to jump through hoops. Note many people don't get
> help here because If I can't attach a script then I won't help. Where
> do you c&nts get off advocating unuseability.
>
> 3. How does one post technical data. Ahh, I see, you slimy piece of
> *** ***, you want to drive traffic to your web site.
>
> So what we have here is
> 1. WRONG INFOMATION. These are binary groups.
> 2. Decietful infomation to drive traffic to web sites that is IMMORAL.
> 3. You don't give a toss for anyone here or you wouldn't be
> advocating lies to promote web site traffic at user expense.
>> In article <#nkDWCkaFHA.3132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Candy" <.>
>> says...
>>> Sure, but most morons here won't see it. MS want to own people.
>>> Therefore they make accessing these groups as hard as possible and
>>> feed people through a web page. The web page doesn't show
>>> attachments (or HTML formatting - so it's a waste of effort to post
>>> technical information as well as it's unreadable).
>>
>> MS Doesn't make anything hard, they provide a Usenet feed that any
>> competent/reasonable ISP will also provide to you. Posting scripts,
>> as scripts, is always a bad idea - post the text of the script a
>> plain text, not html.
>>
>> Usenet is not a HTML place.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
>> remove 999 in order to email me



.

Loading