Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 21:29:16 -0600
Children want attention, why do you?
Earlier you suggested a 5 year old computer is a paperweight.
Now you suggest otherwise.
You are inconsistent.
How can a 5 year old computer be "running well" and also be a paperweight?
If your 1.3 MHz is struggling with Windows XP, something other than Windows
XP is the problem.
My 366 MHz runs XP fine.
You probably have a hardware problem or possibly viruses, spyware and/or
other malware.
If you can not see the differences in Microsoft OSs other than resources,
you are not looking or simply do not see.
What Apple computers do or do not do is not relevant.
Your information about Windows is obviously flawed so your Apple information
is also probably flawed.
--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
In memory of our dear friend, MVP Alex Nichol
http://www.dts-l.org
"ApplesRAwesome" <ApplesRAwesome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:66ABDB9C-4774-491C-A697-08D95D48D57F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> First of all, the title "Microsoft Sucks!" is not an intelligent comment,
> however, it demands attention. I wanted attention, so I had to come up
> with a
> title that would get it.
>
> Second of all, My computer was manufactured in 1999 with a 350MHz
> processor.
> I have not yet upgraded it but it can be done. I have friends who have
> older
> systems and are still running well.
>
> Would you care to explain to me how it is able to run the latest software
> on
> little hardware while my newer Windows PC, with a 1.3GHz processor is
> struggling with XP and never ceases to enrage me for some stupid little
> reason.
>
> Nothing in this world is without flaw. Microsoft, however, is more flawed
> than most alternatives.
>
> And XP is not really a new Operating System. Windows has barely changed
> over
> the years. Even one of the screensavers I have on XP has been on Windows
> Operating Systems since 3.1 and possibly earlier.
>
> Apple Computer actually improves upon their technology with every OS
> release. Microsofts OSes simply crave more system resources and look
> prettier
> with each new release.
>
> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> You did not really say anything to defend.
>> "Microsoft Sucks!" is not an intelligent comment, it is your opinion you
>> are
>> free to have.
>>
>> As for "Show me a 5-year-old PC and you have a paperweight"
>> You show much of your ignorance here.
>> I have a computer nearly 6 years old running Windows XP well.
>> Your experiences seem far to narrow for you to judge anything.
>>
>> --
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
>> In memory of our dear friend, MVP Alex Nichol
>> http://www.dts-l.org
>>
>>
>> "ApplesRAwesome" <ApplesRAwesome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> message
>> news:BF8FB2F4-76CF-4A20-AA4E-DD5B2D79CE47@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > No, actually I've been using legal versions.
>> >
>> > As a child I had 3.1-3.11, then 95, and now XP. School computers have
>> > been
>> > running 2000 and NT, and my brother has had 98 and ME on his laptops.
>> >
>> > Also, I don't see you defending the accusations I've been making, only
>> > falsly accusing me.
>>
>>
>>
.
- References:
- Microsoft Sucks!
- From: ApplesRAwesome
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: Richard Urban
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: ApplesRAwesome
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: Richard Urban
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: ApplesRAwesome
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: Jupiter Jones [MVP]
- Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- From: ApplesRAwesome
- Microsoft Sucks!
- Prev by Date: Virus in system volumn restore file
- Next by Date: Re: Do not buy a Compaq
- Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- Next by thread: Re: Microsoft Sucks!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|