Re: XP Firewall question
- From: Lou
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 18:17:38 -0700
On Thu, 05 May 2005 14:58:45 -0700, "Steve N." <Steve_N@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>BillW wrote:
>
>> I know that this question has been addressed before on this forum, but I'd
>> like to ask it again now that SP2 has been out for awhile. I have a router
>> with a built-in firewall. I have turned off XP's firewall. Is it necessary
>> or a good idea to run both firewalls - the router's and XP's?
>>
>> I don't mind running both - I just don't want to cause any unnecessary
>> problems. Thank you for your help.
>>
>>
>
>I agree with Ron.
>
>Steve
I may be wrong but..
Assuming you have a Lan network behind a router. The router protects
all the computers on the Lan from attacks from the outside world.
Assume one computer on the Lan downloads malware of some kind.
Without a firewall, I think the other computers on the Lan without a
firewall could be infected by the infected home computer. I don't
think the router would protect computers on the Lan from each other.
Again, I may be wrong.
Someone may wish to rebut or confirm my suspicion.
Lou
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XP Firewall question
- From: Steve N.
- Re: XP Firewall question
- References:
- XP Firewall question
- From: BillW
- Re: XP Firewall question
- From: Steve N.
- XP Firewall question
- Prev by Date: Re: How to Delete posts
- Next by Date: Re: Individual consumers left out in the cold with Microsoft Security Advisories?!
- Previous by thread: Re: XP Firewall question
- Next by thread: Re: XP Firewall question
- Index(es):